!DnCCJuwYmWbWvqiELC:matrix.org

dev-db

1007 Members
5 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
12 Jan 2023
@_discord_805968375305469992:t2bot.ioAndy | Source#0027 Collection vs Schema 19:41:48
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source can someone with a windows machine briefly run go tool dist list and check if the output is the following? spinning up a windows vm is not easy for me right now
aix/ppc64
android/386
android/amd64
android/arm
android/arm64
darwin/amd64
darwin/arm64
dragonfly/amd64
freebsd/386
freebsd/amd64
freebsd/arm
freebsd/arm64
illumos/amd64
ios/amd64
ios/arm64
js/wasm
linux/386
linux/amd64
linux/arm
linux/arm64
linux/mips
linux/mips64
linux/mips64le
linux/mipsle
linux/ppc64
linux/ppc64le
linux/riscv64
linux/s390x
netbsd/386
netbsd/amd64
netbsd/arm
netbsd/arm64
openbsd/386
openbsd/amd64
openbsd/arm
openbsd/arm64
openbsd/mips64
plan9/386
plan9/amd64
plan9/arm
solaris/amd64
windows/386
windows/amd64
windows/arm
windows/arm64
20:21:42
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source so far is the same for go tooling on macos arm64 and linux amd64 20:22:05
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source I guess I didn't post this at the right place but if someone wants to chime on which platforms we should support and how, I thought it would be good to decide and document that as part of open sourcing https://github.com/sourcenetwork/docs.source.network/issues/67 20:23:54
@_discord_542229220643045386:t2bot.ioShahzad | Source $ go tool dist list

aix/ppc64
android/386
android/amd64
android/arm
android/arm64
darwin/amd64
darwin/arm64
dragonfly/amd64
freebsd/386
freebsd/amd64
freebsd/arm
freebsd/arm64
illumos/amd64
ios/amd64
ios/arm64
js/wasm
linux/386
linux/amd64
linux/arm
linux/arm64
linux/loong64
linux/mips
linux/mips64
linux/mips64le
linux/mipsle
linux/ppc64
linux/ppc64le
linux/riscv64
linux/s390x
netbsd/386
netbsd/amd64
netbsd/arm
netbsd/arm64
openbsd/386
openbsd/amd64
openbsd/arm
openbsd/arm64
openbsd/mips64
plan9/386
plan9/amd64
plan9/arm
solaris/amd64
windows/386
windows/amd64
windows/arm
windows/arm64
21:23:29
13 Jan 2023
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source you ran it directly on windows?
there's one extra entry on yours which is linux/loong64
00:55:21
@_discord_542229220643045386:t2bot.ioShahzad | Source Yes. 06:29:07
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source to make the question more specific: do we target wasm at all for v0.5? 11:47:45
@_discord_281980464380772352:t2bot.ioJohn | Source Nope 😅 12:37:02
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source we currently target (build & test for) only linux amd64. should we target something else for v0.5 ? 12:41:15
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source * we currently target (build & test for) only linux amd64. should add another target for v0.5? 12:41:27
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source * we currently target (build & test for) only linux amd64. should we add another target for v0.5? 12:41:30
@_discord_281980464380772352:t2bot.ioJohn | Source I'd say not until the nightly CI gets going 12:42:29
16 Jan 2023
@_discord_805968375305469992:t2bot.ioAndy | Source#0027 Gentle nudge for you guys - it feels like I'm starting to build up a decent sized pile of stuff waiting on other stuff/review and it will start to become a problem if not reduced in the next few days. Quick reminder about:

- https://github.com/sourcenetwork/defradb/pull/1018 (DDL draft PR)
- https://github.com/sourcenetwork/defradb/pull/1032 (collection/schema RFC, also includes discussion RE RFC format)
- https://github.com/sourcenetwork/defradb/pull/1026 (schema version id PR)
- https://github.com/sourcenetwork/defradb/pull/989 (P2P integration tests)
- https://source.almanac.io/docs/N2o87ZyxzsruNHSlAErwHMVnqNBPOZFn?docView=Editing (commit/time-travel design)
17:16:53
@_discord_949770387531636757:t2bot.ioFred | Source There is only 989 and 1026 that should be actively moving in the next few days. The other 3 are can still be discussed for a bit longer. 17:38:47
@_discord_949770387531636757:t2bot.ioFred | Source * There is only 989 and 1026 that should be actively moving in the next few days. The other 3 can still be discussed for a bit longer. 17:38:56
@_discord_909906447494705202:t2bot.ioRafael Kaufmann joined the room.18:00:03
@_discord_805968375305469992:t2bot.ioAndy | Source#0027 I don't think that that is relevant and I dont want to get into why I disagree either. The important thing is that I am juggling 5 items and will very likely need to start a 6th in the next hour or so. 18:00:06
@_discord_805968375305469992:t2bot.ioAndy | Source#0027 * I don't think that that is relevant and I dont want to get into why I disagree here either. The important thing is that I am juggling 5 items and will very likely need to start a 6th in the next hour or so. 18:00:19
@_discord_805968375305469992:t2bot.ioAndy | Source#0027 * I don't think that that is relevant and I dont want to get into why I disagree here either(I misread, discussion is good, sitting there waiting for discussion is not good). The important thing is that I am juggling 5 items and will very likely need to start a 6th in the next hour or so. 18:07:49
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source small FYI: sisley/fix/I985-replicator-false-positives is currently not passing CI 20:20:03
@_discord_805968375305469992:t2bot.ioAndy | Source#0027 Yeah that's known, it is waiting on a fix from Fred/John to be merged first 20:20:29
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source ok, thanks 🙂 20:20:37
@_discord_805968375305469992:t2bot.ioAndy | Source#0027 There is a convo in that PR body that goes into why - sorry Orpheus, I could have made that clearer for you+Shahzad 20:21:15
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source i probably should've been more patient and read all the PR convo 20:22:48
@_discord_805968375305469992:t2bot.ioAndy | Source#0027 I dont think that is a fair thing to expect from devs when the build is clearly failing 20:23:38
@_discord_805968375305469992:t2bot.ioAndy | Source#0027 * I dont think that is a fair thing to expect from reviewing devs when the build is clearly failing 20:23:45
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source yeah perhaps a comment at the end of the convo or part of the PR text to contextualize would be helpful for late reviewers like me 20:24:27
@_discord_551058323118489603:t2bot.ioOrpheus | Source * yeah perhaps a comment at the end of the convo or part of the PR text to contextualize would be helpful for late reviewers like me (in an ideal world) 20:24:44
@_discord_805968375305469992:t2bot.ioAndy | Source#0027 added to the bottom of the PR desc 20:38:33

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9