| 30 Sep 2020 |
 babba27 | Unless you want precision to the nearest integer | 20:03:34 |
 uhoh [he/him] | In reply to @babba27:gnuradio.org
Thhe US uses , as the thousands separator. We write 1,000 while they write 1.000 Oh that's true. Maybe we should use the unicode ○ | 20:03:47 |
 FantasyCookie17 | In reply to @fantasycookie17:fantasycookie17.onederfultech.com
Writing 1e3 is better though 😸 (only problem with that is it could somehow be confused with Euler's number) | 20:03:52 |
| babba27 | Also only calculator write 1e3. Its 10^3 when written | 20:03:59 |
| FantasyCookie17 | No, a lot of programming languages use it as well. It's popular in computer science in general. | 20:04:36 |
| FantasyCookie17 | 10^3 = 10³ | 20:04:53 |
| babba27 | Yes, programming languages which derive their syntax from TI-Basic | 20:05:43 |
| uhoh [he/him] | I wish I could program a TI machine in another language cause TI-Basic is kinda ew | 20:06:21 |
| babba27 | Python uses 10**3. That doesn't make it proper in general context | 20:06:42 |
| babba27 | In reply to @uhoh:matrix.org
I wish I could program a TI machine in another language cause TI-Basic is kinda ew I program my TI-84+ CE in C | 20:07:13 |
| uhoh [he/him] | In reply to @babba27:gnuradio.org
Python uses 10**3. That doesn't make it proper in general context And ES6 | 20:07:38 |
| FantasyCookie17 | In reply to @babba27:gnuradio.org
Yes, programming languages which derive their syntax from TI-Basic Sure? Only those? | 20:07:43 |
| uhoh [he/him] | In reply to @babba27:gnuradio.org
I program my TI-84+ CE in C Can you do Rust? | 20:08:02 |
| babba27 | I'm simply saying programming syntax and the math syntax it represents are 2 different things | 20:08:28 |
| babba27 | In reply to @uhoh:matrix.org
Can you do Rust? Unfortunately no. Although people have made a Python-like language for it | 20:08:50 |
| FantasyCookie17 | Rust is easy to learn. | 20:09:10 |
| uhoh [he/him] | I wonder if there are interpreted languages for the TI lol | 20:09:20 |
| babba27 | And their are third-party languages specific to the TI-84 line | 20:09:25 |
| babba27 | In reply to @uhoh:matrix.org
I wonder if there are interpreted languages for the TI lol Yes. The Python-like language I'm pretty sure is interpreted | 20:09:51 |
| uhoh [he/him] | I always thought it would be fun to create a programming language. Anybody ever tried? | 20:10:27 |
| babba27 | The TI Nspire has actual Python | 20:10:33 |
| FantasyCookie17 | In reply to @uhoh:matrix.org
I always thought it would be fun to create a programming language. Anybody ever tried? Make it like Malbolge but harder 😸 | 20:11:08 |
| babba27 | In reply to @uhoh:matrix.org
I always thought it would be fun to create a programming language. Anybody ever tried? A few times, actually. Its fun but can be tedious | 20:11:39 |
| FantasyCookie17 | Write a compiler in Scratch 😸 | 20:11:55 |
| babba27 | Ewww | 20:12:04 |
| uhoh [he/him] | Oh yeah Scratch! I learned how to code on Scratch. GNU should make a Scratch clone that would be cool | 20:12:27 |
| babba27 | Scratch is yucky | 20:12:29 |
| babba27 | And icky | 20:12:34 |
| babba27 | And gross | 20:12:38 |
 The ex-AI | i thought it was basic and good for beginners. | 20:13:29 |
