| 24 Dec 2019 |
| 02:18:32 |  clindbeck3 | 2M5FLBQB or anyone else who has an opinion. I want the capability to make tests that either use the currently enabled plays (my first thought), or load a playbook file and use those plays (might be a little more robust for sequential tests if each one enables and disables plays). I'm thinking that I should just either modify the base test with an option parameter or make a sub-class that gets the currently enabled plays from the play registry in main and adds them to the enabled plays list in the constructor? Because a lot of the time I want to test the competition playbook as a whole and I don't want to have to modify each of my tests each time the playbook is changed. Is there an easier way to do that? |
| 02:31:33 |  chachmu | That is what the test system currently does |
| 02:32:37 | chachmu | Well... I guess you would have to copy paste the pbk file into the test right now. I guess we could add a way of specifying the location of a pbk instead, wouldn't be very hard |
| 02:38:07 | clindbeck3 | So currently it just uses the currently enabled plays? Than what does the self.play_list do? Does it only change the enabled plays if that list isn't empty? |
| 02:38:58 | chachmu | Yeah ok I should have read your entire post more carefully. Just have the function that loads the test check if the play_list is actually a path to a pbk. Or you could add another member variable that specifies the pbk and if it's not none have the function use it instead of play_list |
| 27 Dec 2019 |
| 10:03:11 | |  antoine joined the room. |
| 30 Dec 2019 |
| 20:04:19 |  guyfleeman | Just FYI there's some charter on the league discord about how to log behavior trees for replay. Y'all should chime in |
| 2 Jan 2020 |
| 23:58:58 | |  thor joined the room. |
| 6 Jan 2020 |
| 19:04:26 | |  justus joined the room. |
| 7 Jan 2020 |
| 17:23:28 | |  diniyar joined the room. |
| 17:27:08 | |  louis joined the room. |
| 10 Jan 2020 |
| 23:29:49 | |  niels joined the room. |
| 15 Jan 2020 |
| 00:37:57 | chachmu | Somebody messed up and broke make run for soccer. When you click on the soccer field it immediately seg faults on staging. |
| 00:38:07 | chachmu | On further introspection, it might be because of me. I'll have to look into this |
| 00:41:54 |  jyc5776 | I'm not getting this |
| 16 Jan 2020 |
| 18:56:35 |  kwstach | Is anyone on the plays side working on/planning to work on the ball placement challenge? IIRC that was planned as a technical challenge for division B. |
| 19:01:50 |  hgynai | So I was looking at it before, I know Woodward made the play |
| 19:02:03 | hgynai | I can take a deeper look into it though |
| 19:11:10 | clindbeck3 | I just modified the placement play to actually function and it looks like dribble is the current failure point. Every time we tap the ball we lose it and the dribble has to recapture. It's calls to gamestate are borked probably due to the refactor, shouldn't be too hard to fix. Yeah the dribble behavior is uhh not great. To say nothing of how it will perform irl with our physical dribblers. |
| 19:15:30 | clindbeck3 | It's a capture and dribble to point pretty much. It's just that both capture and dribble are bad even in sim, let alone on hardware. |
| 19:16:39 | hgynai | I mean when I ran 2M5FLBQB's play I remember it working fine, but that's obviously just in sim |
| 19:18:01 | clindbeck3 | It definitely does not work now on staging. After gamestate fixes and hardcoring the point I get dribble bumping/failure. |
| 19:29:50 | chachmu | It was tuned like 4.5 years ago so I don't know what you expected to happen |
| 19:31:23 | clindbeck3 | It's better than I expected tbh considering we've never had a great reason to do ball placement and are bad at many other more important things. |
| 19:33:03 | clindbeck3 | It's probably not very practical to work on until it can be tested on a real robot with relatively decent motion control imo. As that's going to be the key pieces of information. |
| 19:42:45 | hgynai | By the way we figured out that Jason's capture and stuff wasn't working because his friction was way too low on grsim |
| 19:43:27 | clindbeck3 | Oh, I just assumed placement in restarts was it? Is that not it? |
| 19:44:01 | hgynai | What do you mean, sorry? |
| 19:57:04 |  tjones320 | Also dribbler is about to change too |
| 19:58:03 | tjones320 | We should test after we get the new dribblers up and running |
