9 Jan 2022 |
flawedworld | In reply to @graphenegirl:matrix.org Hi flawedworld yo | 08:13:28 |
ejecting sussi amogi since 2021 | In reply to @june:grapheneos.org hi ppman420 from matrix.org hi June from goth os dot org | 08:13:44 |
lberrymage | ejecting sussi amogi since 2021: Howdy | 08:14:49 |
ejecting sussi amogi since 2021 | hi berry | 08:15:02 |
| sticcus joined the room. | 12:14:22 |
| jenkei joined the room. | 14:04:13 |
matchboxbananasynergy | In reply to @lberrymage:matrix.org Probably. I like dark colors, so something purple and/or blue will stay Hopefully we also get a clean light theme! | 15:52:05 |
@graphenegirl:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 16:12:49 |
matchboxbananasynergy | Absolutely, most apps have a "system", "dark" and "light" theme option | 16:13:22 |
matchboxbananasynergy | I think the Aurora Store's design is nice, for example | 16:13:35 |
matchboxbananasynergy | I like the clean modern light theme | 16:13:40 |
lost_cause | Looking forward to see your app grow. I'm very happy to see a project like this. | 16:41:12 |
matchboxbananasynergy | For sure! Take your time and do it right, we desperately need an app store with sane security as an alt to Play Store!\ | 16:45:01 |
matchboxbananasynergy | * For sure! Take your time and do it right, we desperately need an app store with sane security as an alt to Play Store! | 16:45:41 |
matchboxbananasynergy | lberrymage: On the Github page, under the About section of the readme, it says: "Accrescent aims to provide a accessible app store with modern security features and strict minimum requirements for apps in its repository."
It should be "an accessible app store", I believe.
| 16:47:26 |
lberrymage | In reply to @matchboxbananasynergy:matrix.org Hopefully we also get a clean light theme! You will! Accrescent technically already has a dark and light theme and chooses the appropriate one based on the system theme. It'll become more user-visible with the UI overhaul | 18:39:11 |
lberrymage | In reply to @matchboxbananasynergy:matrix.org
lberrymage: On the Github page, under the About section of the readme, it says: "Accrescent aims to provide a accessible app store with modern security features and strict minimum requirements for apps in its repository."
It should be "an accessible app store", I believe.
Thanks! I'll fix that as soon as I get a chance | 18:39:41 |
lberrymage | Fixed it | 18:58:42 |
lberrymage | I'm working on designing the developer portal and I'd like to hear your guys' thoughts on this: | 19:17:05 |
lberrymage | The current primary workflow for a developer is authenticate -> upload app + metadata -> server-side validation -> server pushes app to repository | 19:17:10 |
lberrymage | How should the server "push" apps to the repository? | 19:17:36 |
lberrymage | I'm unfamiliar with how this kind of task is traditionally done, so any insight into this problem is appreciated | 19:19:30 |
@graphenegirl:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 19:46:54 |
| @strangefield:matrix.org joined the room. | 19:47:03 |
@graphenegirl:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 19:51:16 |
@graphenegirl:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 19:51:48 |
lberrymage | Authentication will likely be Oauth with GitHub since it covers most developers and keeps me from needing to write an authentication system from scratch. That way developers can also have 2FA like you described from the get-go | 19:59:17 |
Wonderfall |
for making sure it is truly the developer?
Apps being signed prior to their upload should solve the issue. Despite Play App Signing, Google still requires that the developer signs the uploaded app before they resign it, so they can be sure it's the developer.
| 19:59:30 |
lberrymage | In reply to @lberrymage:matrix.org Authentication will likely be Oauth with GitHub since it covers most developers and keeps me from needing to write an authentication system from scratch. That way developers can also have 2FA like you described from the get-go Eventually they'll be able to add API keys for uploading from CD | 20:00:12 |
Wonderfall | In reply to @lberrymage:matrix.org Authentication will likely be Oauth with GitHub since it covers most developers and keeps me from needing to write an authentication system from scratch. That way developers can also have 2FA like you described from the get-go I think it's a good idea | 20:01:26 |