Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
13 Sep 2023 | ||
Is this the right place for feedback to the survey? feedback here probably won't be seen, but I'm not sure what to suggest instead. maybe wait for a scala-users post about it (if one doesn't appear soon I'll make sure one does) and reply there? | 22:32:04 | |
* Is this the right place for feedback to the survey? feedback here probably won't be seen by the survey makers, but I'm not sure what to suggest instead. maybe wait for a scala-users post about it (if one doesn't appear soon I'll make sure one does) and reply there? | 22:32:41 | |
* Is this the right place for feedback to the survey? feedback here probably won't be seen by the survey makers (though you never know). but I'm not sure what to suggest instead. maybe wait for a scala-users post about it (if one doesn't appear soon I'll make sure one does) and reply there? | 22:32:51 | |
14 Sep 2023 | ||
17:20:17 | ||
17:20:24 | ||
15 Sep 2023 | ||
Scala Center roadmap — slides from Scala Days https://twitter.com/scala_lang/status/1702254760605155582 | 10:27:15 | |
12:12:35 | ||
12:12:44 | ||
18 Sep 2023 | ||
21:53:47 | ||
21:54:19 | ||
19 Sep 2023 | ||
12:07:32 | ||
12:07:37 | ||
PSA to library authors, if you use Scala 2's -doc-source-url flag to add source links to your Scaladoc, the flag's behavior changed in 2.13.12 and you may need to adjust your build to avoid generating broken source links. Details at https://github.com/scala/bug/issues/12867 . This information has also now been added to the Scala 2.13.12 release notes. | 14:58:51 | |
armanbilge PSA | 16:12:12 | |
Just add a slash where one is missing, that's all 🙂 | 20:39:45 | |
Best to just check with your case. What I did to fix it in sbt-tl was just add a slash | 20:48:20 | |
It seemed to be that the rest of the link was unaffected | 20:48:29 | |
Som suggested otherwise, but that might be if you're also using another flag | 20:48:46 | |
20 Sep 2023 | ||
Play Framework release candidate supporting Scala 3 https://github.com/playframework/playframework/releases/tag/2.9.0-RC2 | 06:24:51 | |
please (and I'm talking to everyone discussing above, not just Arman) record any useful information on the ticket | 06:25:26 | |
behold! the Scala 3 spec has landed, thanks to the efforts of sjrd https://scala-lang.org/files/archive/spec/3.4/ | 15:22:43 | |
It’s deprecated. I think that spec section could reasonably be removed. | 20:44:38 | |
It is a completely user space API now? | 21:14:42 | |
21 Sep 2023 | ||
followup clarifying what remains incomplete: https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/pull/18526/commits/0c59aa180c3feb3e31ef7f308fc8b76e99147d87 | 09:34:37 | |
Scala 2:
Scala 3:
but then if you put scala-xml on the classpath it works without a deprecation warning or a requirement for a language import, even under -source:future . I think this an oversight — I'll open a ticket (or a PR) later | 09:49:08 | |
* Scala 2:
Scala 3:
so the error message isn't as nice which I don't care so much about... ...but then if you put scala-xml on the classpath it works without a deprecation warning or a requirement for a language import, even under -source:future . I think this an oversight — I'll open a ticket (or a PR) later | 09:49:31 | |
(oh oops, we're on #links, didn't mean to reply here, let's take any followups to #scala-contributors) | 09:50:29 | |
22 Sep 2023 | ||
11:54:36 | ||
11:54:42 | ||
24 Sep 2023 | ||
19:58:09 |