5 Jan 2024 |
max397 | well but that's not it | 15:53:15 |
max397 | data will be stored in a db | 15:53:21 |
max397 | it won't be possible to just replace a function | 15:53:33 |
champignoom | yeah and db is improvements of filesystem | 15:53:42 |
champignoom | querying from filesystem is slower but does the same job as querying from db | 15:54:00 |
champignoom | by filesystem I mean all the .norg files | 15:54:57 |
max397 | do whatever u want | 15:55:07 |
max397 | we could discuss about this all day long you just want sth quick and I think this makes no sense | 15:56:25 |
champignoom | No I mean the future ideal UI can start already | 15:58:06 |
champignoom | if the parts are reasonably decoupled | 15:58:25 |
champignoom | with clear interfaces | 15:58:56 |
champignoom | | 16:00:06 |
max397 | ik what u mean and i disagree | 16:01:30 |
champignoom | which part | 16:01:46 |
champignoom | I think you're referring to the earlier topic | 16:02:00 |
champignoom | not the one I'm quoting | 16:02:06 |
max397 | nope | 16:02:18 |
max397 | I'm referring to this | 16:02:22 |
champignoom | then I'm confused | 16:02:30 |
max397 | I think you're underestimating how much there is to this | 16:02:50 |
max397 | how many different apis there have to be how complicated the whole thing is and how much is has to be able to do | 16:03:08 |
max397 | it's just not just listing some tasks and being able to modify there state | 16:03:23 |
champignoom | do you really mean "have to be", or "can be"? | 16:04:40 |
champignoom | since at least for me, listing some tasks is already useful | 16:04:58 |
champignoom | unless we're expecting some full-fledged query language | 16:08:03 |
max397 | have to be | 16:10:19 |
max397 | there isn't just a "get tasks" api which can be replaced when the "real" imlementation can be done | 16:10:39 |
champignoom | any doc for the apis? | 16:12:16 |
max397 | iirc there is a document laying around | 16:12:38 |
max397 | no full specification though | 16:12:41 |