11 Jun 2021 |
@arjix:matrix.org | I would also like to point out that the functions our neurons model are not linear. | 18:36:31 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | Statistics are the only device we have for modeling quantum super amplitudes and their distribution | 18:37:51 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | That’s well established | 18:38:01 |
@arjix:matrix.org | I don't see how that connects to how our brains work ? Could you elaborate ? | 18:40:20 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | Our brains are electro chemical machines. Their potential modulation very precisely controls the firing potential. This activity etches the photonic immersion of the firing into the neural substrate (probably mitochondria though the mechanism is not pinned down.) this is where the quantum state of substrate is read and written to. Like a storage device. Only it is not a storage device, it is a quantum sieve in which potential constructively and destructively interferes. | 18:48:35 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | The chemical computer of our brain pushed information into these micro singularities, and reads Bach what the super amplitude reveals | 18:49:34 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | * The chemical computer of our brain pushed information into these micro singularities, and reads back what the super amplitude reveals | 18:49:41 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | So our will and substance of thought floats upon these singularities. | 18:50:10 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | And exercising our minds calibrates and expands the capacity for the activity | 18:50:44 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | Statistics are merely the science of how data distributes | 18:51:20 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | Modern AI is essentially automated statistics | 18:51:39 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | Our minds follow the objective abstract principle of potential distribution and resolve to useful single state outcomes | 18:52:16 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | *
I don't see how that connects to how our brains work ? Could you elaborate ?
Statistics are merely the science of how data distributes | 18:52:47 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | (Well applied) statistics models this phenomenon | 18:53:30 |
@arjix:matrix.org | I know a bit about neurons but this sounds like crazy talk to me, so possibly i'm heavily outclassed, in which case i definitely would like to see some sources on that. | 18:54:43 |
@arjix:matrix.org | The first part about the "chemical quantum computers", the other about about the modern AI i agree with. | 18:55:40 |
@arjix:matrix.org | * The first part about the "chemical quantum computers", the other part about the modern AI i agree with. | 18:56:27 |
@arjix:matrix.org | I mean, from what i know, the chemistry doesn't really matter, what matters is the logic that the chemistry emulates, which is what statistics are modelling in artificial neural networks. | 18:59:56 |
@arjix:matrix.org | * I mean, from what i know, the chemistry doesn't really matter, what matters is the logic that the chemistry emulates, which is what the statistics are modelling in artificial neural networks. | 19:00:16 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | Chemistry to electro to photonic to quantum perturbation. The electro chemical machine writes and reads and plays back neural firings. The neural firings are the map/configuration for accessing root thoughts, memories, and determination trees . | 19:03:23 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | The quantum component is far more energy efficient than any model of linear cognition (which includes any cause/effect chain) | 19:04:42 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | Even nonlinear models require linear decoding/encoding, heuristic branching | 19:05:40 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | The quantum sieve model creates a micro singularity which aggregates all potentials simultaneously | 19:06:22 |
@arjix:matrix.org | Where could i read more about that ? | 19:06:40 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | Allowing that of greatest weight to raffle up to the top of consideration | 19:06:54 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | This is twenty years of contemplation on various sources of cognitive theory.
Don’t take my word for it, let this guide your curiosity | 19:08:21 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | Look intro the mystery of mirror neurons. Evidence that neurons (and other cells) entangle at a distance. Quantum holography. | 19:09:51 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | And what it means to be a sieve | 19:10:11 |
@inphovore:matrix.org | Of constructive and destructive interference | 19:10:29 |
@arjix:matrix.org | Right, i prefer actual science over quiet contemplation. Mirror neurons are the neurons we see light up on brain imagery when the subjects see other person perform some physical action, it has nothing to do with all the other crap. I gave you the benefit of the doubt, but you say a lot of complex words but not anything of substance. | 19:13:38 |