| 3 Aug 2018 |
 komodobridge | [discord] <CryptoVortek> Heat Ledger | 03:28:55 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <CryptoVortek> Supernet is the largest holder of Heat | 03:29:07 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <CryptoVortek> https://heatbrowser.com/report.html | 03:29:08 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <CryptoVortek> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1959885.0 | 03:29:30 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <CryptoVortek> https://twitter.com/CryptoVortek/status/1025037243935645697 | 03:30:08 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <CryptoVortek> I think it would be great if SuperNet and Heat were aiming for more mutual collaboration... Supernet has Agama wallet that covers 95% of all tokens but lacks liquidity. Heatwallet strives to also cover many of the current crypto tokens. Supernet is for anonymity and safety security. Heat is for speed and efficiency. Both are Decentralized exchanges with universal wallets to hold crypto assets. Both offer ICO plans for private use of their tech in private chains. Both Supernet Komodo and Heat Ledger are striving to take over the ICO industry from ETH. Supernet does Decentralized ICOs Dicos... and Heat for Legal security issuances, ICOs, IPOs... The alignment is close to exact in purpose, but in their differences.. Supernet Anonymous, Secure with Dpow, with slow atomic swaps from direct wallet to wallet.... Heat Fast and high speed trading with tokens.
All ICOs on SuperNET and on HeatWallet with their private chains can be exchanged in both heat and agama wallets. Adding liquidity to both platforms.
-----------------
disclosure heat and komodo are in my top 5 holdings .... | 03:30:58 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <jl777c> #heat created | 08:27:34 |
| 7 Aug 2018 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <ph03nix> @jl777c can crypto conditions be used to automate dividend payments? | 05:08:35 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <Mylo(KomodoPioneers)> a smart contract must be triggered by a transaction. after it is triggered, whatever you want it to do.
The comments for this rewards contract may be something of interest to you: https://github.com/jl777/komodo/blob/jl777/src/cc/rewards.cpp
(if you can't wait for an answer) | 05:29:14 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <Mylo(KomodoPioneers)> actually i just read the docs, it's more for locking coins and getting rewarded - not what you're after @ph03nix , apologies. But the triggering statement still is true 😃 | 05:30:30 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <ph03nix> thanks mylo | 05:49:45 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <ph03nix> i guess what i was referring to was SN assets | 05:50:43 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <ph03nix> like once the barterdex fee account reaches a certain level of kmd, it pays out automagically | 05:51:38 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <Mylo(KomodoPioneers)> ok in that instance, and you can wait for a 'james reply', but you need a tx to trigger the contract. the contract can then check the balance of another address, and then do an evaluation based on the result of that query. if > threshold, go into the dividend logic - sure. providing there is sufficient permissions to unlock the funds from the calling contract, again yeah it's all tx, vins & vouts signed by keys that provide the answers to the cryptographic puzzles. | 06:18:49 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <jl777c> @Mylo(KomodoPioneers) the rewards CC is about locking coins and getting rewarded, since its the rewards contract | 06:59:08 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <jl777c> however, what happens after the coins are locked can be literally anything that can be coded. It would be possible to do a dividends contract, but I am a bit nervous about having to get consensus to the satoshi for thousands of payments. If your node is not current, it wont be able to validate it and if there is any problem with the DB it might go out of consensus. Maybe I am just being worried over nothing though as so far all seems to be in sync across the contracts, even after reorgs | 07:01:48 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <jl777c> The bigger issue with DEX dividend would be the cross chain nature also from a practical point it just seems easier to manually trigger a dividend payout with normal sendmany transactions. then it sidesteps needing to deal with massive tx vector with CC contract | 07:03:22 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <jl777c> for assets that are getting revenues to a single address, the easiest would just be to collect it in a CC address directly, which would have rules that only a dividend payout is acceptable way of doing a payout | 07:04:12 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <Mylo(KomodoPioneers)> @dukeleto nice scenario builder 👆 😃 | 07:10:04 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <ph03nix> 👍 | 08:50:36 |
| 8 Aug 2018 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <FishyGuts> I had a shower thought this morning, Since KMD has privacy on transactions, is there privacy on the asset chains, the smart contracts and information?
What about a partnership with Enigma? They just released their test net and it would be an amazing logical next step for KMD to really make CryptoConditions take off. | 05:04:51 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <dukeleto> @FishyGuts asset chains have all the features of the main KMD chain, such as shielded transactions, zaddrs, z_sendmany/etc | 05:10:10 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <dukeleto> @FishyGuts smart contracts mostly operate on transparent addresses, but part of a smart contract could be "send X to this zaddr", and then the funds are shielded. But the smart contracts themselves, they are stored in the public part of the blockchain | 05:11:22 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <FishyGuts> So you've got the majority of it covered. What about shielding the smart contracts? | 05:11:54 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <dukeleto> James can answer in more detail, but that is how I understand it. I just started working on the test suite + continuous integration for CryptoConditions | 05:12:11 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <FishyGuts> I think that would help alot more people feel comfortable with real world transactions of that nature. | 05:12:14 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <FishyGuts> Enigma is basically doing striclty that, to my knowledge. Smart contract privacy. | 05:12:35 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <FishyGuts> Enigma is basically doing that, to my knowledge. Smart contract privacy. | 05:12:43 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <dukeleto> the final action could be "Send to this zaddr", and that person has privacy. But all the detail of exactly how the smart contract works, needs to be public so the network can read it, verify it, etc | 05:13:01 |
| komodobridge | [discord] <FishyGuts> I could even offer it to my customers if there was a way to run it through a clearing house to convert their monthly payments to fiat. A Smart contract for autopay would be fantastic. | 05:13:24 |
