Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
18 Jan 2021 | ||
andrewsh | I forgot about it, sorry | 15:16:35 |
uhoreg | In reply to @dilinger:queued.netFrom a quick look, it looks mostly fine. The only thing is I'm wondering why libquotient-dev breaks/conflicts with libqmatrixclient-dev . I don't think they should have any files in common. | 15:48:36 |
Andres | Yeah, I thought about that a bit. That's the standard way to do a dummy package so that you don't keep the old pre-rename version and the new version instaled in parallel, but you're right there's no files in common. The only scenario I could think of where it would be undesirable would be a developer trying to keep both installed in order to build older quaternion or something at the same time you're trying to build newer spectral, and I thought that was highly unlikely. So I stuck w/ the standard way. | 17:06:28 |
Andres | The only other thing I worried about was the 0.6 vs 0.6.4 ABI. I know upstream is trying not to break API with 0.6, but I'm not certain about ABI. In the end, knowing that 0.7 is just around the corner, I went with 0.6 because I figure there likely won't even be a 0.6.5 | 17:08:35 |
uhoreg | In reply to @dilinger:queued.netYeah. The problem is that if you build a libqmatrixclient-dev package, then if someone tries to build older quaternion and has that package installed, it will fail because it doesn't provide the same files. And we couldn't have both libqmatrixclient and libquotient in sid at the same time since they both provide libqmatrixclient-dev . Which means that this will be a library transition, and library transitions are blocked now. So I think it's best to drop the libqmatrixclient-dev package from libquotient, and drop the breaks/conflicts. | 17:13:40 |
uhoreg | In reply to @dilinger:queued.netI think upstream is pretty careful about keeping the ABI, so 0.6 should be fine. | 17:14:20 |
Andres | In reply to @hubert:uhoreg.caOkay, I'll do that in the next upload. Since I had to do a binary upload to get it into NEW, it won't be transitioning to testing until I do a source-only upload. | 17:16:49 |
uhoreg | yup | 17:17:12 |
kitsune | In reply to @hubert:uhoreg.caYup, upstream makes every effort to maintain both API and ABI within each 0.x, and both break between 0.x and 0.y. | 20:15:57 |
kitsune | Also - there might be 0.6.5 with backports of some most useful/unobtrusive things in a few months. | 20:17:14 |
kitsune | And yes, can we please let libqmatrixclient-dev go entirely in unstable, as I’m really not certain about supporting it for much longer than now. | 20:19:21 |
kitsune | * And yes, can we please let libqmatrixclient-dev go from unstable, as I’m really not certain about supporting it for much longer than now. | 20:20:06 |
uhoreg | Yeah, once I upload the new quaternion (and it migrates to testing), I'll request a removal of libqmatrixclient. | 20:26:20 |
20 Jan 2021 | ||
Andres | libquotient is now in sid | 19:45:19 |
RSS Bot [@hubert:uhoreg.ca] | Debian package news for nheko: Accepted nheko 0.8.0-1 (source) into unstable | 22:23:43 |
21 Jan 2021 | ||
RSS Bot [@hubert:uhoreg.ca] | Debian package news for matrix-synapse: A new upstream version is available: <a href="https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/archive/v1.26.0rc1.tar.gz">1.26.0~rc1</a> | 05:05:13 |
Adrià García-Alzórriz joined the room. | 14:00:51 | |
taco joined the room. | 22:00:41 | |
23 Jan 2021 | ||
uhoreg | Just noticed that libquotient isn't built with encryption enabled. I guess we need to package libqtolm for that to happen. | 16:27:47 |
RSS Bot [@hubert:uhoreg.ca] | Debian package news for quaternion: Accepted quaternion 0.0.9.5~beta2-1 (source) into unstable | 16:36:57 |
RSS Bot [@hubert:uhoreg.ca] | Debian package news for quaternion: <a href="https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=quaternion">version in VCS is newer</a> than in repository, is it time to upload? | 18:16:57 |
Andres | In reply to @hubert:uhoreg.caIs libqtolm being maintained? Seems to be as idle as spectral right now | 21:09:02 |
24 Jan 2021 | ||
uhoreg | It's just a wrapper around libolm, so I don't think it really needs much maintenance. | 01:14:37 |
uhoreg | andrewsh: I don't know if you saw this: https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/9187 The next version of Synapse (1.26.0) will depend on psycopg2 >= 2.8, while buster only has 2.7.7. So you'll probably need to upload a new psycopg2 to backports before Synapse 1.26.0 goes into backports. | 02:56:55 |
andrewsh | In reply to @hubert:uhoreg.cathanks! | 09:20:24 |
Linda | In reply to @hubert:uhoreg.ca
reading that makes me angry | 11:40:07 |
Linda | emphasis on the claim of "uncommon configuration" | 11:40:21 |
Linda | or the other way to put it:
| 11:41:16 |
RSS Bot [@hubert:uhoreg.ca] | Debian package news for matrix-synapse: Accepted matrix-synapse 1.25.0-1~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports | 13:06:41 |
Praveen joined the room. | 15:57:00 |