!tIDEIWechmqCLjPiui:decred.org

DCR Governance

169 Members
3 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
6 Sep 2018
@Haon:decred.orgHaon

the article mentions "LR isn't a mechanism that can be deployed and widely adopted right away" which is an understatement:

For one, it hasn't been fully tested in the wild and may be vulnerable to unanticipated attacks or economic quirks. Secondly, the mechanism relies heavily on identity systems, meaning that for now, it can't coexist with anonymity, which is highly important to many people in the space. Plus, certain kinds of known vote attacks could mean that LR might need people to use trusted hardware, which some warn come with their own security trade-offs.

20:59:10
@Haon:decred.orgHaon

the end quote is interesting:

"Nothing would thrill us more than to see other collaborations that pose original, alternative visions for solving what we see as the crisis of liberal order."

21:03:16
@Haon:decred.orgHaonbasically we are doing exactly that with Politeia21:03:31
@Haon:decred.orgHaonsomething completely different21:10:17
@Haon:decred.orgHaon someone in #trading:decred.org posted about Particl and their new proposal system, so I started investigating it 21:10:52
@Haon:decred.orgHaonthey make the distinction between 1) opportunity proposals and 2) improvement proposals21:11:53
@Haon:decred.orgHaon

Particl Improvement Proposal (PIP) requirements:

providing information to the Particl community, or describing a new feature for Particl or its processes or environment. The PIP should provide a concise technical specification of the feature and a rationale for the feature.

21:13:41
@Haon:decred.orgHaon

Particl Opportunity Proposal (POP) requirements:

providing information to the Particl community, describing bounty opportunities, integration opportunities, or marketing opportunities. Philanthropy, donations, sponsorship's

21:14:58
@Haon:decred.orgHaonit seems useful to have this kind of destinction, so voters will know whether it is a technical proposal or a "we should do X" proposal21:16:51
@Haon:decred.orgHaonhttps://github.com/particlcommunity/pops/blob/master/pop-0000.mediawiki21:16:57
@Haon:decred.orgHaon

this kind of aligns with what we have for Politeia, although I like our approach a bit better:

  1. What: In the What section we try to answer what we are proposing. This should be a short description of the problem that will be addressed.
  2. Why: In the Why section we try to answer why the proposal is needed and why it is a good idea.
  3. How: (no decription, but it's about the execution and costs)
  4. Who: In the Who section, describe the entity that is making the proposal, will complete the work, and will draw down on the proposal's budget.
  5. When: In the When section we try to answer what will be delivered when and when the stakeholders get to vote on the milestones.

(copied from the "read more" section of test-proposals)

21:32:36
@bee:decred.orgbee

Interesting.

This process was heavily influenced by the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) process and Decred Change Proposal (DCP) although it has been modified to fit the needs of Particl.

21:56:04
@Haon:decred.orgHaoncredit to Decred! I didn't even catch that22:01:25
@Haon:decred.orgHaonpretty awesome that projects are learning from us22:01:55
@Haon:decred.orgHaonclassic: https://github.com/particlcommunity/pops/issues/2722:03:47
@Haon:decred.orgHaonI was just about to do the same 😄22:04:05
7 Sep 2018
@bridge:decred.org@bridge:decred.org[slack/gravityz3r0] Cum😂 07:03:06
@bridge:decred.org@bridge:decred.org[slack/davecgh] I'm not sure where they got Jake's name from for the process document either.16:08:12
@bridge:decred.org@bridge:decred.org[slack/davecgh] https://github.com/decred/dcps/blob/master/dcp-0000/dcp-0000.mediawiki16:08:28
@bridge:decred.org@bridge:decred.org[slack/davecgh] I was the author. Jake provided feedback, as the DCP states.16:09:48
@bridge:decred.org@bridge:decred.org[slack/jy-p] yeah, was all davecgh16:56:21
8 Sep 2018
@bee:decred.orgbee set a profile picture.19:40:58
@bee:decred.orgbee removed their profile picture.19:41:10
@bee:decred.orgbee set a profile picture.19:41:31
9 Sep 2018
@Haon:decred.orgHaon removed their profile picture.15:12:18
@Haon:decred.orgHaon set a profile picture.15:12:42
@Haon:decred.orgHaon changed their profile picture.15:20:44
@Haon:decred.orgHaon changed their profile picture.16:26:46
11 Sep 2018
@bridge:decred.org@bridge:decred.org[slack/jy-p] ok, got something regarding pi voting to discuss22:38:04
@bridge:decred.org@bridge:decred.org[slack/jy-p] right now, each proposal can only have a single vote called22:38:12

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: