Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
5 Jan 2019 | ||
mediapathic | or, is there a better way to do that than killing the indirect buffer? | 01:20:29 |
mediapathic | (and that is the third time today I've typed "bugger" for "buffer" and maybe I should eat more) | 01:21:14 |
mediapathic | What's the correct terminology for the buffer that's created when I C-c ' on a src block? I love that thing too. | 01:42:30 |
&Adam | In reply to @mediapathic:matrix.orgwait. Is that new? I feel like I've had that a long time. | 02:10:48 |
alphapapa | In reply to mediapathicI just use C-S-b to open a subtree in an indirect buffer. I have a small advice function that renames the indirect buffer with the name of the subtree. | 02:12:38 |
alphapapa | FYI: just published https://github.com/alphapapa/unpackaged.el#agenda-for-subtree-or-region | 02:12:57 |
alphapapa | mediapathic: You might find this useful: | 02:14:37 |
alphapapa |
| 02:14:45 |
mediapathic | In reply to @adam:thebeckmeyers.xyzBernt Hansen has some stuff that emulates it, which I stole back in my "copy and paste blindly" days. You maybe did the same thing? | 03:21:49 |
mediapathic | In reply to @alphapapa:matrix.orgoooh thanks. | 03:22:01 |
&Adam | maybe its spacemacs-specific. Too lazy to check right now. | 03:22:11 |
mediapathic | oh, yeah, that could be | 03:22:34 |
Anant Paatra | It seems the behavior is similar to narrowing to subtree and narrow widen, and indirect to subtree is also SPC (or M-m in my case) s b | 03:22:56 |
Anant Paatra | in spacemacs that is | 03:22:59 |
Anant Paatra | narrowing to subtree is SPC s n | 03:23:36 |
Anant Paatra | and SPC n w | 03:23:55 |
Anant Paatra | so its definitely very fast, but not exactly toggling | 03:24:07 |
&Adam | ah ya. That | 03:24:59 |
mediapathic | I should look at the spacemacs code and see how they get rid of the indirect buffer | 05:01:39 |
&Adam | I've never used indirect buffers with org in spacemacs, so I can't say that that's a feature that exists. | 05:03:27 |
&Adam | Anybody know how to have org automatically insert a given license header into all source-code files generated when tangling a document? | 05:03:58 |
alphapapa | In reply to &AdamSure, take a look at unpackaged.el | 05:04:20 |
alphapapa | I have a header that gets tangled into the file | 05:04:31 |
&Adam | will do. Thanks. | 05:04:35 |
&Adam | not helpful for my usecase. | 05:06:13 |
alphapapa | In reply to &Adam:( | 05:06:23 |
&Adam | in that package, you're just generating a single tangled .el file. | 05:06:34 |
&Adam | I'm manually specifying in the :tangle header where each src block should go. :/ | 05:07:00 |
&Adam | I guess I could just include a noweb reference at the top of each one, but that feels real hacky... | 05:07:21 |
&Adam | probably what I'll do for right now anyway to not spend too much time yak-shaving. | 05:07:49 |