!nluluIEuYMvHftcVDs:matrix.org

Radical Native WebExtension (deprecated / archived)

45 Members
Project archived, see https://github.com/stoically/radical-native/issues/44 | Was: Extending Element with native capabilities: https://github.com/stoically/radical-native | Current release: 0.1beta1523 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
28 Oct 2020
@swedneck:feneas.org@swedneck:feneas.orgWell shit16:27:18
@jryans:matrix.orgJ. Ryan Stinnett
In reply to @stoically:matrix.org
same policies apply for self-distribution if you want it signed
Really? Do they actually review and reject them though?
16:27:48
@stoically:matrix.orgstoicthey do16:27:57
@tulir:maunium.nettulirI thought self-distribution only had quick automated review 🤔16:28:12
@stoically:matrix.orgstoicthere's always automated review for not-recommended-program add-ons16:28:34
@stoically:matrix.orgstoicthey do manual reviews on certain triggers16:28:51
@jryans:matrix.orgJ. Ryan StinnettHmm, that seems like a change in policy then... 😕 I did not think there was any regular full review when self-distributing.16:29:21
@tulir:maunium.nettulirah right, so element just contains certain triggers which means it always requires a review16:29:34
@stoically:matrix.orgstoiccorrect16:29:44
@dannycolin:mozilla.org@dannycolin:mozilla.org
In reply to @jryans:matrix.org
Hmm, that seems like a change in policy then... 😕 I did not think there was any regular full review when self-distributing.
It's been like that for a while now.
16:31:48
@stoically:matrix.orgstoic
In reply to @kinghat:matrix.org
didnt realize they can remove extensions from ppls browsers
firefox checks whether the certificate of add-ons is still valid latest on browser restart. hence why add-on-geddon could happen
16:34:02
@jryans:matrix.orgJ. Ryan StinnettWell, fabulous. Yet another thing for me to hate about Mozilla's absurd gatekeeping then. 🤬16:34:24
@stoically:matrix.orgstoic
In reply to @jryans:matrix.org
Well, fabulous. Yet another thing for me to hate about Mozilla's absurd gatekeeping then. 🤬
personally i think those are valid concerns from AMO regarding radical, it'd require changes upstream tho, and i don't see that happen
16:35:25
@jryans:matrix.orgJ. Ryan Stinnett I mean, I was aware they had the means to review and block self-distributed add-ons... Did not realise they were actually doing it regularly though. 😭 16:35:28
@jryans:matrix.orgJ. Ryan Stinnett
In reply to @stoically:matrix.org
personally i think those are valid concerns from AMO regarding radical, it'd require changes upstream tho, and i don't see that happen
My personal view is more fundamental than that, I guess: I do not want Mozilla or anyone telling me what add-ons I can install.
16:37:40
@stoically:matrix.orgstoicfair point16:38:08
@stoically:matrix.orgstoici'd agree with that16:38:14
* @jryans:matrix.orgJ. Ryan Stinnett adds this to the list of why I may need to build my own browser, even though I really don't want to 😭16:41:00
@stoically:matrix.orgstoichah16:41:12
@stoically:matrix.orgstoicshould be easy enough tho, no longer than a weekend16:41:40
@jryans:matrix.orgJ. Ryan Stinnett
In reply to @stoically:matrix.org
should be easy enough tho, no longer than a weekend
😜 That's like gamers on Reddit saying "just add multiplayer, should only take a day"
16:43:33
@stoically:matrix.orgstoicheh16:43:47
@stoically:matrix.orgstoicjust need an addressbar to enter website names16:44:07
@stoically:matrix.orgstoichow hard can it be16:44:34
@travis:t2l.ioTravisRMight I introduce you to WebView in WinForms?16:44:47
@travis:t2l.ioTravisRsure, it's an embedded IE10, but it's a browser16:45:03
@stoically:matrix.orgstoicconsider it done16:45:23
@travis:t2l.ioTravisRit has programmatic support for back and forwards too16:46:19
@travis:t2l.ioTravisReven a reload button!16:46:23
@stoically:matrix.orgstoic:D16:46:31

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 5