!lKGMmeuaEzYkvpwBOS:matrix.org

Fedora Blocker Review

110 Members
Fedora Blocker Bugs Review Channel - Meetings on Monday @​ 17:00 UTC - http:/​/​fedoraproject.​org/​wiki/​QA:SOP_​blocker_​bug_​process18 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
15 Apr 2024
@adamwill:fedora.imadamw Neil Hanlon: oh, interesting. i was always using full screen 17:38:18
@geraldosimiao:matrix.orggeraldosimiaoOk, yeah 17:38:24
@nielsenb:fedora.imBrandon Nielsen
In reply to @adamwill:fedora.im
Neil Hanlon: oh, interesting. i was always using full screen
I was doing a selection
17:38:33
@geraldosimiao:matrix.orggeraldosimiaoSo just FE 17:38:35
@adamwill:fedora.imadamwso, i'm -117:38:35
@adamwill:fedora.imadamwcounting nirik and brandon as -1 we're at -317:38:43
@nhanlon:beeper.comNeil Hanlon
In reply to @nielsenb:fedora.im
I was doing a selection
that's even odder 😂
17:38:45
@adamwill:fedora.imadamwother votes?17:38:45
@nielsenb:fedora.imBrandon NielsenFinalBlocker -117:38:50
@nhanlon:beeper.comNeil Hanlon-117:38:51
@salimma:fedora.imMichel Lind 🎩FinalBlocker -117:39:05
@nhanlon:beeper.comNeil HanlonFB-1, to be clear17:39:09
@geraldosimiao:matrix.orggeraldosimiaoFB -1 FE +117:39:10
@salimma:fedora.imMichel Lind 🎩FinalFE +117:39:20
@nhanlon:beeper.comNeil HanlonFE+117:39:26
@adamwill:fedora.imadamwsure, FE +117:39:28
@nirik:matrix.scrye.comnirikFinalBlocker -117:40:27
@geraldosimiao:matrix.orggeraldosimiaoAnd, after all, is this gnome shell or pipewire mesa? 17:40:29
@geraldosimiao:matrix.orggeraldosimiaoWhat do you think? 17:40:42
@tablepc:matrix.org@tablepc:matrix.orgI just tried a screencast on an area and it was all messed up for color17:40:59
@adamwill:fedora.imadamwproposed !agreed 2275099 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - our testing during the meeting suggests this is almost 100% reproducible on libvirt/qemu VMs (especially without 3D passthrough), but not reproducible at all on bare metal. That makes this a conditional violation of the "basic functionality" criterion for default apps and the default panel functionality criterion, but we judge that it's not severe enough to constitute a blocker, but it is bad enough to grant an FE.17:41:31
@adamwill:fedora.imadamw geraldosimiao: dunno, we can figure that out outside the meeting I guess 17:41:39
@nielsenb:fedora.imBrandon Nielsenack17:41:49
@nhanlon:beeper.comNeil Hanlonack17:41:51
@adamwill:fedora.imadamw tablepc: are you testing in a VM or on metal? sorry, i'm losing track :D 17:42:06
@geraldosimiao:matrix.orggeraldosimiaoAck 17:42:09
@tablepc:matrix.org@tablepc:matrix.orgmetal17:42:22
@tablepc:matrix.org@tablepc:matrix.orgJust gor wide white and blue strips17:43:28
@adamwill:fedora.imadamwhum, what system?17:43:30
@adamwill:fedora.imadamw!agreed 2275099 - RejectedBlocker (Final) - AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - our testing during the meeting suggests this is almost 100% reproducible on libvirt/qemu VMs (especially without 3D passthrough), but not reproducible at all on bare metal. That makes this a conditional violation of the "basic functionality" criterion for default apps and the default panel functionality criterion, but we judge that it's not severe enough to constitute a blocker, but it is bad enough to grant an FE.17:43:40

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 5