!iYztYTWFUTjPezadNN:matrix.org

Catholicism

245 Members
Thomistic philosophy and all discussions of a metaphysical nature are primary, secondary issues regarding apologetics. Also anything regarding Catholic doctrine plus dogma and the application of it in real modern day life.49 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
27 Jul 2021
@syril:matrix.orgsyrilThat's not all04:10:45
28 Jul 2021
@magister:tradcatholic.orgMagister
In reply to @emanresu_:matrix.org
the sad thing is CPAC will probably apologize
CPAC are a bunch of niggers
00:27:04
@syril:matrix.orgsyrilYeah00:37:57
@syril:matrix.orgsyrilI prefer AIPAC, as far as PAC's go00:38:27
@syril:matrix.orgsyril* I prefer AIPAC, as far as PAC's go00:38:45
@emanresu_:matrix.orgemanresu_ Does God approve of the use of the n-word?03:08:08
@antennas:matrix.orgYosef changed their display name from antennas to Yosef.04:56:10
@syril:matrix.orgsyril
In reply to @emanresu_:matrix.org
Does God approve of the use of the n-word?
Admittedly it could be scandalous to some, but other than that there's nothing wrong with it, assuming it isn't done from hate.
11:10:41
@syril:matrix.orgsyrilRacism is not a sin.11:13:02
@syril:matrix.orgsyrilIt is a virtue to love your race above others.11:50:54
@syril:matrix.orgsyrilAlso, when people cite "There is neither Jew nor Greek" to try to refute the above, tell them to read on to where St. Paul says, "There is neither man nor woman.", and their argument falls apart.12:26:23
@j:sneagan.comjacksonThe only word God bans is the unconsidered use of is His name.12:28:23
@j:sneagan.comjacksonPeople who take the name of God in vain without a thought but treat other words as sacred are demonstrating what they truly hold in reverence.12:29:16
@j:sneagan.comjackson * People who take the name of God in vain without a thought but treat other words as sacred are demonstrating what they truly hold revere. 12:29:30
@j:sneagan.comjackson
In reply to @emanresu_:matrix.org
Does God approve of the use of the n-word?
* The word only God bans is the unconsidered use of is His name.
13:04:59
@j:sneagan.comjackson * People who take the name of God in vain without a thought but treat other words as sacred are demonstrating what they truly hold in reverence.13:05:17
@magister:tradcatholic.orgMagisterRedacted or Malformed Event13:18:42
@magister:tradcatholic.orgMagister
In reply to @emanresu_:matrix.org
Does God approve of the use of the n-word?
What word are you referring to?
13:19:13
@gerryireland:matrix.orggerryireland
In reply to @j:sneagan.com
People who take the name of God in vain without a thought but treat other words as sacred are demonstrating what they truly hold in reverence.

Only in the most basic of terms does “taking the name of the Lord in vain” mean this.

It is referring rather to our nature as imagers of God.

Pre-judging people on the basis of where they come from or what they look like would in fact fall into this category of behaviour.

13:42:30
@j:sneagan.comjackson * The only word God bans is the unconsidered use of is His name.14:57:06
@j:sneagan.comjacksonYou're obsessed with bigotry. No one is talking about bigotry here.14:57:54
@gerryireland:matrix.orggerryireland

Syril is talking about loving particular groups of people over others. He has also talked about forcing some groups of people to leave the country and go somewhere else.

He therefore pre-judges and is prepared to act upon his pre-judgement to the detriment of other human beings.

Pointing out that such pre-judgement on the basis of racial or religious grouping is contrary to our work as imagers of God does not constitute an obsession with bigotry.

15:44:52
@gerryireland:matrix.orggerryireland I suppose if I am obsessed by anything it is helping others to avoid such pitfalls. I would be very happy if Syril joined the Church for example and discarded the clearly erroneous teaching he is currently influenced by. 15:47:29
@john.facies:matrix.orgjuan
In reply to @syril:matrix.org
Also, when people cite "There is neither Jew nor Greek" to try to refute the above, tell them to read on to where St. Paul says, "There is neither man nor woman.", and their argument falls apart.
Can you elaborate on why the argument falls apart?
17:19:09
@syril:matrix.orgsyrilSt. Paul isn't saying there is no difference between man or woman.17:53:01
@gerryireland:matrix.orggerryireland
In reply to @syril:matrix.org
St. Paul isn't saying there is no difference between man or woman.
Yes. That doesn’t make the argument fall apart.
18:46:23
@gerryireland:matrix.orggerryireland

The verse is about the spiritual equality of believers, which makes the pre judgement and especially the discrimination inherent in things like racism and sexism untenable for the Christian, since it categorises people into groups of higher and lower value based on physical characteristics.

Discrimination of this kind is therefore a materialistic way of viewing the world; a denial of the reality of the immortal soul.

19:26:04
@gerryireland:matrix.orggerryireland *

The verse is about the spiritual equality of believers, which makes the pre judgement and especially the discrimination inherent in things like racism and sexism untenable for the Christian, since it categorises people into groups of higher and lower value based on physical characteristics.

Discrimination of this kind is therefore a materialistic way of viewing the world; a denial of the reality of the immortal soul.

19:27:08
@syril:matrix.orgsyril5hwq8h.jpg
Download 5hwq8h.jpg
21:00:55
@syril:matrix.orgsyril Sup yung_hegel 21:57:11

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room List