In reply to @afranke:matrix.org
Have you read the CONTRIBUTING.md file?

This is a Google Summer of Code project, you can follow the development in my blog. This MR is intended for live reviews about the progress of the project.

First part – Implement a basic media history viewer (18 days)

• [x] Add MediaTimeline list model that can load media messages (6 days)
• [x] Add a subpage to the RoomDetails dialog for the media history with a GtkGridView that links to the MediaTimeline (2 days)
• [ ] Add MediaHistoryImage widget that can show an image message type (3 days)
• [ ] Add MediaHistoryVideo widget that can show a video message type (3 days)
• [ ] Add MediaHistoryAudio widget that can show an audio message type (1 day)
• [ ] Add MediaHistoryVoice widget that can show a voice message type (1 day)
• [ ] Add MediaHistoryFile widget that can show a file message type (2 days)

Second part – Add click actions to the media history widgets (18 days)

• [ ] Integrate the MediaViewer inside the media history page as a subpage (2 days)
• [ ] Make image and video message types to be opened by the MediaViewer on click (2 days)
• [ ] Make the file of the MediaHistoryFile widget to download on click and show the progress (6 days)
• [ ] Make the file of the MediaHistoryFile widget open on click when it’s downloaded (2 days)
• [ ] Add a dialog to listen to the audio of the MediaHistoryAudio and MediaHistoryVoice widgets on click (6 days)

Third part – Filters & Animations (12 days)

• [ ] Wrap the MediaTimeline list model to a GtkFilterListModel to be able to filter the list (1 day)
• [ ] Add options to filter the media history by media type (4 days)
• [ ] Add animations to the MediaViewer to open and close photos and videos (3 days)
• [ ] Add a swipe back gesture to the MediaViewer, similar to the one found in Telegram (4 days)

hey, this is the most promising client, it might just save the idea of matrix in my mind (matrix UX could be better). I have two questions:

1. when (roughly) should fractal next become stable, and reach near feature parity with say element?
2. is there plans for Vim bindings and fuzzy finding? Would you accept PRs for such? Or would you consider a plugin system to enable this? (that's four questions lol)

In reply to @oush9:matrix.org

hey, this is the most promising client, it might just save the idea of matrix in my mind (matrix UX could be better). I have two questions:

1. when (roughly) should fractal next become stable, and reach near feature parity with say element?
2. is there plans for Vim bindings and fuzzy finding? Would you accept PRs for such? Or would you consider a plugin system to enable this? (that's four questions lol)

Hi, thanks for the nice words.

1. There's no exact date yet for when we consider it stable, although our criteria for that is at least feature-parity with our stable version. Feature-parity with Element is not one of our goals as we only plan to implement features that make sense for our client.
2. I'm pretty sure we would want fuzzy finding. In regards to Vim bindings I guess we need to discuss it. I'd advise you to open an issue about it. Adding a plugin system is out of scope for this project.

In reply to @shadow_orochi:matrix.org
sorry for my question but is it safe to log in with my main matrix account on fractal nightly build?

In reply to @adbeveridge:matrix.org
I created a Matrix (cool movie) account using Element, signing in with my GitHub account, how do I sign in using Fractal?