| 3 Apr 2024 |
 darknao | but not actively promote it as a primary download option (because it's not) | 14:35:21 |
| darknao | The server edition already have a dedicated net installer artifact, so we're not going to add the everything net install there as well, that would be confusing I think | 14:36:13 |
 Farchord (Steve Cossette) | For now, maybe promote the Everything installer like all the other SiGs? | 14:37:28 |
| darknao | but yeah, I think the best move right now is to do nothing :) and keep things where they are | 14:37:44 |
| Farchord (Steve Cossette) | Put things a bit more centralized if that makes sense | 14:37:44 |
 glb | I can see where there are unique conflicts between the server network installer and the everything network installer. We probably need to let people know up front that if they want to install the server edition using an online installer, the "everything" installer is not the right one to use. | 14:38:15 |
| glb | The two online installers should probably be listed on the same page with the differences spelled out right next to the download links. | 14:40:59 |
| darknao | I think what we need is a dedicated page for everything, or at least a small paragraph explaining what "Everything" is. Then add a link to the Server page for users that are interested with the server installer instead | 14:44:29 |
| 4 Apr 2024 |
|  Michel Lind đ„ changed their profile picture. | 18:13:16 |
| 9 Apr 2024 |
|  Clément Verna changed their display name from cverna to Clément Verna. | 14:13:41 |
| Clément Verna set a profile picture. | 14:13:59 |
| 15 Apr 2024 |
 nirik | Hey folks. I wonder if we could do something so download links on the website always get https? ie, related to https://github.com/fedora-infra/mirrormanager2/issues/311 and someone on social media getting a http:// link and their browser flagging it. Are you all using download.fedoraproject.org redirect? I don't recall... might be difficult to pass https there... | 16:29:33 |
| darknao | all download links on the website use https://download.fedoraproject.org already | 16:39:28 |
| nirik | right, which is a redirect, but it can get http mirrors. would have to look if we can override that there. | 16:44:49 |
| darknao | do we have other alternatives to download.fp-o to download artifacts? (other than dl.fp-o) | 16:45:39 |
 davdunc | In reply to @darknao:fedora.im
do we have other alternatives to download.fp-o to download artifacts? (other than dl.fp-o) I use dl.fp-o for vagrant downloads right now | 16:46:37 |
| davdunc | if that changes or need to do it differently, I'd appreciate a heads up. | 16:47:05 |
| nirik | dl is the master mirrors... it's best to point at the mirror network rather than directly to master mirrors for things that will get hit a lot | 16:52:04 |
| nirik | (but I don't know if vagrant downloads do. ;) | 16:52:13 |
| davdunc | they don't redirect well. | 16:52:34 |
| davdunc | or haven't in the past. . . I can configure a test for the download.fp-o | 16:53:06 |
| nirik | yeah, I don't think the download redirectory cares about &protocol=https any... but would need to look at mirrorlist code I guess to know for sure. | 17:06:09 |
| darknao | assuming I'm reading this correctly https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/blob/main/f/roles/httpd/reverseproxy/templates/reversepassproxy.mirrormanager-redirector.conf#_17 the redirect should only returns https mirror if using https://download.fp-o | 17:07:35 |
| darknao | and a quick test seems to confirm that, querying https://download.fp-o only gives me https mirror, whereas http://download.fp-o returns http only mirrors | 17:09:59 |
| darknao | so, all good? | 17:10:04 |
| nirik | huh. I guess so, but wonder how the user got a http one. | 17:10:37 |
| nirik | https://wien.rocks/@christoph_do/112254121412782542 and the thread after | 17:11:36 |
| nirik | yeah, so perhaps a user error copying and pasting or something I guess? | 17:12:28 |
| darknao | yeah I think so, the user mentioned they used the link from the ticket here https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11879#comment-905150 which is indeed http, and the next comment from adamw on the mastodon thread make me think there was a copy/paste error at some point | 17:24:47 |
| nirik | ok, I'll follow up with them... sorry for the noise. ;) | 17:30:12 |
