|15 Dec 2018|
|22:57:50||raidenman joined the room.|
|23:02:01||@vence:matrix.org left the room.|
|16 Dec 2018|
|22:40:01||@ssanghera:matrix.org joined the room.|
|22:41:07||@ssanghera:matrix.org removed their display name ssanghera.|
|17 Dec 2018|
|07:48:04||radkov||How to add the account to the running node for staking ?|
|10:28:20||Adil|| https://poc-2.polkadot.io/#/staking |
|10:29:34||Adil||Account actions tab|
|10:57:20||talfco|| radkov : check out “Polkadot Hello World Article Series” https://link.medium.com/cern21xFIS |
|15:34:17||radkov||Yep I've staked in the accounts section but I've set nowhere in the node configuration the address|
|18:05:22||patchkez joined the room.|
|18 Dec 2018|
|02:38:36||bc.game_coco joined the room.|
|09:56:47||tez1331 joined the room.|
|13:22:22||Terence | Forbole joined the room.|
|13:23:28||aurel changed their display name from aurel to aurel (The Brave).|
|14:41:44||alexandra||Substrate 1.0 Beta is out! 🎉🎉🎉
|14:45:10||edwardt|| 🎉 |
|14:46:06||hskang096|| 🎊 |
|14:57:47||Raul || 🎆 |
|16:49:30||skilus joined the room.|
|17:23:10||arikan||Congrats for the Substrate Beta release!
Can we already use 1.0beta in substrate-node-template? https://github.com/paritytech/substrate-node-template|
|17:26:11||Gav||just merged the update|
In reply to @gavofyork:matrix.parity.io Thanks!
just merged the update
|19:53:43||aurel changed their display name from aurel (The Brave) to aurel.|
In reply to @gavofyork:matrix.parity.io What do you mean, by arbitrary message passing? Why would a node enabling transactions between chains route any other message than a valid transaction? By attacking in this case I guess you mean flooding the network. Because, there could still be a transaction fee attached to it in order to be accepted by the target chain? Again, I'm not saying this concept would be efficient or reliable, however, I don't see why it fundamentally cannot work.
And once you allow arbitrary message passing, then you can attack the more secure chain for the cost of the least secure chain.