!fOOzymDEHiIIUtmlBE:matrix.org

Polkadot Watercooler

5146 Members
Website: https://polkadot.network/ Resources: http://wiki.polkadot.network Chatroom conduct: https://hackmd.io/ULADdNflR2Sk-6AiPhSwmw59 Servers

Load older messages


Timestamp Message
28 Mar 2020
09:55:15@juanmac:matrix.org@juanmac:matrix.org left the room.
29 Mar 2020
07:35:32@motionfactroy:matrix.orgmotionfactroy joined the room.
08:19:27@eunoia:matrix.orgEunoia | Resistance changed their display name from Eunoia Nous to Eunoia | Resistance.
10:58:46@ken_g:matrix.orgken_gI have a question that seems like no one has the answer to ... or wants to answer. How many tokens will be liquid on day 1? Your site says you sold 50%, i.e. 5m, in the sale. All of those will be liquid on Day 1, right? Then there's 20% more you call "pre-launch" distro. Then there's 30% held by Web 3, that I assume won't be liquid on day1? Or maybe a series of questions ... to be more exact lol I've directly DM'd on Twitter ... have asked on TG ... and am now here. A lot of work to get info that should be public knowledge. Hope this is my last stop v(^_^)...
13:37:09@cty:matrix.orgcty joined the room.
14:28:23@gavofyork:matrix.parity.ioGav In so far as was originally intended (at sale time), up to 100% could be transferable once transfers are enabled. That said, the reality is a little different since many of the tokens that have been allocated are locked and have a linear unlocking schedule over some fairly substantial period of time (2 years in many cases). I can’t give any specific details on how many will be locked at the time that transfers are enabled (I don’t know and it might yet change as further sales and deals happen), though it’ll be easy to scrape from the chain itself as it’s 100% transparent. I would guess it’ll be somewhere between 10 and 20 percent.
14:29:05@gavofyork:matrix.parity.ioGav * In so far as was originally intended (at sale time), up to 100% could be transferable once transfers are enabled. That said, the reality is a little different since many of the tokens that have been allocated are locked and have a linear unlocking schedule over some fairly substantial period of time (2 years in many cases). I can’t give any specific details on how many will be locked at the time that transfers are enabled (I don’t know and it might yet change as further sales and deals happen), though it’ll be easy to scrape from the chain itself as it’s 100% transparent. I would guess it’ll be somewhere between 10 and 20 percent.
15:00:00@ken_g:matrix.orgken_g
In reply to @gavofyork:matrix.parity.io
In so far as was originally intended (at sale time), up to 100% could be transferable once transfers are enabled. That said, the reality is a little different since many of the tokens that have been allocated are locked and have a linear unlocking schedule over some fairly substantial period of time (2 years in many cases). I can’t give any specific details on how many will be locked at the time that transfers are enabled (I don’t know and it might yet change as further sales and deals happen), though it’ll be easy to scrape from the chain itself as it’s 100% transparent. I would guess it’ll be somewhere between 10 and 20 percent.

Appreciate the response ... is all I was looking for and I completely understand the complexities that you mentioned. Ball park figure works for me.

At the risk of coming off as a complete lunatic (too late for that ?) ... my sojourn into Telegram to seek an answer didn't go so well. Is there a forum where I can lodge a complaint about one of the mods in there.

I've been called a liar, publicly and then warned ... when in fact the opposite happened. I feel pretty strongly that I shouldn't have to be labeled a liar and be bullied by a moderator that is, in fact, doing the lying.

This almost certainly isn't the right place to ask this ... but am unsure of where to go, so please feel free to point me in the right direction.

15:03:24@hutch:web3.foundationhutch ken_g: how else can we answer your question? There aren't any more specifics we can give that would be relevant to your question other than what gav himself has said.
15:04:22@hutch:web3.foundationhutch I didn't call you a liar, I said that I didn't appreciate being pinged with a sarcastic remark on the weekend to a question that I hadn't seen myself (no I didn't see your DMs yet). It's part of our code of conduct here what i'm referring to, never said you're a liar.
15:07:51@joshuam10o:matrix.parity.ioJamScreenshot_20200329_170646.jpg
Screenshot_20200329_170646.jpg
15:08:18@joshuam10o:matrix.parity.ioJamto be specific :)
15:31:59@hutch:web3.foundationhutch * I didn't call you a liar, I said that I didn't appreciate being pinged with a sarcastic remark on the weekend to a question that I hadn't seen myself (no I didn't see your DMs yet). It's part of our code of conduct here what i'm referring to, never said you're a liar.
15:38:43@ken_g:matrix.orgken_gThanks Jam ... tbh ... I hadn't read those rules. I'm also a bit hesitant to add anything because I feel this isn't the right place for this conversation but I will say this. I first asked the mod, in the public channel, and only sent a DM after I had their permission. <----- seems I unknowingly went above and beyond that procedure you underlined v(^-^) My DM was read and ignored ... so I waited for a day or two and asked a follow up question about where I might be able to find the answers I was looking for, if they didn't have the answers ... which was also ignored. It was only after that that I tagged them in my public question. Anyway ... another bizarre point is that I was warned to stop talking about ... whatever it is that's going on here ... and now they are continuing to bring the subject up ... after I received a warning by them for the very same thing! They're also complaining that I am bringing this up here ... but what was I supposed to do? Rack up 3 warnings and then get booted ... because only they are allowed to do things that they themselves punish us plebs for doing. Anyway ... whatevs ... not like I'll be the last person to manhandled by someone with authority. Live long and prosper, everyone ... I won't broach this subject again.
15:45:29@hutch:web3.foundationhutchThe warning was from flooding the telegram channel with an off-topic conversation and sarcastically “thanking me” for not responding, your DM wasn’t ignored; I simply hadn’t seen it yet. Patience is a virtue, one love ❤️ ✌️
15:53:44@hutch:web3.foundationhutch Dm me if you wanna get on a quick chat to talk about it ken_g, would be glad to talk with you, I want you to feel welcomed. Thanks!
16:59:03@knowerlittle:matrix.orgknowerlittleI'll summarise all the above in 2 words: 'wen moon?' 🃏
18:46:21@openlet:matrix.orgfox changed their display name from openlet to fox.
19:35:32@sorpaas:matrix.parity.ioWei Tang (back on Wed!) changed their display name from Wei Tang to Wei Tang (back on Wed!).
19:39:30@kmanijak:matrix.orgkmanijak joined the room.
20:08:43@ken_g:matrix.orgken_gChildish people you have working over there on TG. My account has been flagged as spam. Can't believe it. Have been invested in Polka since mid 2017 ... have only ever supported the project with postive messages on social media etc. ... am invovled with validating / staking on Kasuma and Edgeware. Your admin on TG is flat out lying ... even the reason for the official warning (it's all there in the timeline) ... is missusing his power as an admin ... and is enabling a gang like culture with this coordinated attack on me. I'm not sure what to do ... I'll drop it (for the second time, I realise) but I suppoe it'll remain a data point for peeps that know him better because I don't know him from a bar of soap... but this could've been handled so much better. Well I know the pressures of being an admin on TG. I'm kind of shocked how it escalted so quickly ... I did go and double check what the checkmarks in DMs mean on TG ... single check is message received and double check means message read. What a weird day !! v(^_^) My DMs were open until you called me a liar ... I doubt you'll retract because I didn't (not my thing) take screenshots of the check marks. You can open that direct line of communication, if you retract ... I'm no really fussed about the account being flagged as spam ... that was just another data point. I really don't think I can make my position any clearer and with no other outcome but a he says, she says ... consider the matter dropped, for me. Don't see why we can't work around eachother ...
21:28:30@hutch:web3.foundationhutchRedacted or Malformed Event
21:28:39@hutch:web3.foundationhutch* I never called you a liar, it’s all open on the chat.
21:31:04@hutch:web3.foundationhutch Just dm me, I told you we could work it out.
21:31:49@hutch:web3.foundationhutch The telegram channel moderation is strong because lots of scammers every day, but I said let’s take this discussion out of here if you have any problem with some action I took.
21:34:58@hutch:web3.foundationhutch No one is inciting gang like culture, the rules are the rules for many good reasons, let’s just keep this channel on topic, your questions were answered.
30 Mar 2020
03:29:54@hodl_farm:matrix.orghodl_farm joined the room.
03:31:49@hodl_farm:matrix.orghodl_farm set a profile picture.
04:02:38@azezo:matrix.orgazezo joined the room.
06:04:08@shawnringlin:matrix.org@shawnringlin:matrix.org

The 7th @polkadotnetwork Ecosystem Project AMA | @Kiltprotocol was successfully held! 🎉

Ingo Rübe, KILT project leader & CEO of BOTLabs GmbH, shared KILT Technology, Usecases & Plan
🎉
Articles:
https://bit.ly/KILT-AMA-0328-PolkaBase-Medium
polkabase.com/blog
Channel: t.me/CryptoSkyAMA


There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room List