!fImemMAwUAGwrlOcWH:matrix.org

OpenLMIS-General

61 Members
16 Servers

Load older messages


Timestamp Message
8 May 2020
10:24:36@_slack_openlmis_UMFG6DS49:matrix.orgXiang Li (edited) ... order page.*聽The facility1 ... => ... order page. the a*The facility1 ...
11:43:44@_slack_openlmis_U67M7HX8A:matrix.orgjbebak Hello everyone! I would like to say that today's my last day in the Core project (though, who knows, maybe I'll return to it one day or to one of OLMIS implementation). I'd like to thank you for those nearly 3 years - it's been wonderful and I learned a lot during them. Thank you again and probably see you sometime in the future 馃檪
11 May 2020
11:50:57@_slack_openlmis_B7JF9KDNK:matrix.orgtwitter @OpenLMIS: Supply chain #data visibility is more important now than ever. OpenLMIS is a #digitalsolutions that can help countries predict product demand and plug into global #COVID19 supplies coordination efforts. https://t.co/QG1RYqz1vB
12 May 2020
11:36:28@_slack_openlmis_UBB6KN8JJ:matrix.orgWes
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U67M7HX8A:matrix.org
Hello everyone! I would like to say that today's my last day in the Core project (though, who knows, maybe I'll return to it one day or to one of OLMIS implementation). I'd like to thank you for those nearly 3 years - it's been wonderful and I learned a lot during them. Thank you again and probably see you sometime in the future 馃檪
I'm so sorry to hear this, Joanna! You will be sorely missed but we are thankful for the time we were able to work with you.
13 May 2020
03:23:05@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_UMFG6DS49:matrix.org
Hi everyone, when we use openLIMIS 3.9 that we built ourselves, we have a View Order problem, hoping to confirm whether the current phenomenon is correct? The user of ddmfacility sets the view order right with supplying facility which is Dep贸sito Distrital Cuamba聽in fulfillment. The user can see View Orders menu and the supplying facility is Dep贸sito Distrital Cuamba in the view order page.聽I think this is correct. However, the user of facility1 sets the right of Manage proofs of delivery in supervision. *The user also can see View Orders menu and the supplying facility is itself in the view order page. the a*The facility1 has no supply capacity. Why the supplying facility is itself? Is this a problem?
Hmm, I鈥檓 not sure I follow and I know the facility ddmfacility isn鈥檛 in demo-data. chunky56 do you know the context?
16:32:03@_slack_openlmis_B7JF9KDNK:matrix.orgtwitter @OpenLMIS: The case for using digital solutions for #publichealth #SupplyChains is stronger than ever before #nowmorethanever Join us for a webinar "Leveraging OpenLMIS for #COVID19 Response". Tuesday May 19th, 10 EST/ 4pm Geneva. Register here: https://t.co/gmmOFLAw67 https://t.co/6RlQtO5kki
18:40:27@_slack_openlmis_U04BG5XL8:matrix.orgchunky56
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.org
Hmm, I鈥檓 not sure I follow and I know the facility ddmfacility isn鈥檛 in demo-data. chunky56 do you know the context?
Xiang Li joshzamor i think ddmfacility is supposed to mean the district facility, which we have Deposito Distrital Cuamba for demo data. i believe there is a bit of confusion about what the user of facility1 will need; it may need both rights. i am not quite sure about the question of a supplying facility being itself. can you clarify?
14 May 2020
07:21:08@_slack_openlmis_UMFG6DS49:matrix.orgXiang LiRedacted or Malformed Event
07:24:08@_slack_openlmis_UMFG6DS49:matrix.orgXiang Li
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_UMFG6DS49:matrix.org
Thank you for your feedback. chunky56 joshzamor 1. Ddmfacility means the聽the district facility, such as Dep贸sito Distrital Cuamba. 2.Scenario: as the picture show, there are 2 facilities of Cuamba, Cuamba and Dep贸sito Distrital Cuamba. The user of Dep贸sito Distrital Cuamba, whose name is divo1, can approve the requisition from Cuamba, Cuamba and can fulfill orders which Cuamba, Cuamba requisitions.聽Because divo1 can fulfill orders, he/she is set Warehouse Clerk Role聽in the Fulfillment. When the user of Cuamba, Cuamba, whose name is vsrmanager2, receive an order, vsrmanager2 need confirm it to change its status聽in the Manage Proof of Delivery Component.聽So vsrmanager2 is set the right of Manage Proofs of Delivery.聽 After vsrmanager2 is set the right of Manage Proofs of Delivery, the View Order component under Orders navigation bar can be seen. Whether can聽this component for this right be seen? And in the View Order Page,聽the supplying facility is Cuamba, Cuamba which is itself. If Cuamba, Cuamba has no supply capacity, the order list by the supplying facility of itself is empty in View Order list. So I don鈥檛 know what the purpose( the supplying facility is its own facility) is.
13:58:55@_slack_openlmis_UBSGVMUD8:matrix.orgPaulina Buzderewicz changed their profile picture.
15 May 2020
16:07:48@_slack_openlmis_B7JF9KDNK:matrix.orgtwitter @OpenLMIS: The case for using digital solutions for public health #supplychains is stronger than ever before. @DigitalSQR @CHAI_health Join us for a webinar on May 19: Leveraging @OpenLMIS for COVID-19 Response. RSVP: https://t.co/YRXHwsq4lR https://t.co/bpfzptTwL8
18 May 2020
05:33:31@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor Technical Committee: This week is packed, I鈥檓 thinking we should move the technical committee to next week (27th). The alternative is that it could be held this week, but I鈥檇 have to ask someone to lead the call as I wouldn鈥檛 be able to. Thoughts?
07:20:06@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.orgsbrudzinski Re: tech committee - it seems to be scheduled the same hour as the showcase, so noone on ur side would be able to attend
07:21:10@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.orgsbrudzinski Btw. I see that currently we have it scheduled every 3 weeks. Should we have the call every 4 weeks so it better fits our all bi weekly meetings?
18:17:19@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor Thanks sbrudzinski, I'll push it back a week. I posed this question earlier this year in the forum on our frequency, and the winner was once a month / every 4 weeks, however I think in the following call there was some concern that brought it to 3 weeks. I'll move it to every 4 weeks and look to see if I can find and address that concern another way.
19 May 2020
07:55:40@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.orgsbrudzinski Hm, I don't recall myself any push back on 4w schedule, so that works for me. If anyone else has any troubles with it, please feel free to speak up
14:45:19@_slack_openlmis_UBB6KN8JJ:matrix.orgWes @room Note that the Product Committee meeting was moved to next week. An updated meeting invite was sent but please let me know if you need the details of the change
20 May 2020
03:23:32@_slack_openlmis_U010B7VKSM9:matrix.orgjingzhao(TW)Screen Shot 2020-05-20 at 11.16.53 AM.png
Screen Shot 2020-05-20 at 11.16.53 AM.png
03:23:32@_slack_openlmis_U010B7VKSM9:matrix.orgjingzhao(TW) Hi everyone, when we created the requisition, we found a stock management bug, please help us to confirm it. We have a requisition period from May 1 to May 30. product A produced the first stock movement record on May 20. product A's "Stock at Beginning of Period" should be 0, but it is equal to the current stock on hand of product A. Please check the logic of the attached code.
23 May 2020
09:16:37@gustav:ggc-project.degustav joined the room.
25 May 2020
13:27:23@_slack_openlmis_UGHGVT2TY:matrix.orgOskar Hinc Hi Wes and joshzamor! As we were going to have a meeting to review reporting stack configuration issues this week - maybe it would be good to discuss it at Tech Committee Call? Or should I schedule a separate meeting instead?
15:04:46@_slack_openlmis_U9KJYRGTA:matrix.orgSatish Choudhury joined the room.
15:06:05@_slack_openlmis_U9KJYRGTA:matrix.orgSatish Choudhury changed their display name from _slack_openlmis_U9KJYRGTA to Satish Choudhury.
15:06:05@_slack_openlmis_U9KJYRGTA:matrix.orgSatish Choudhury set a profile picture.
15:06:08@_slack_openlmis_U9KJYRGTA:matrix.orgSatish Choudhuryimage.png
image.png
15:06:08@_slack_openlmis_U9KJYRGTA:matrix.orgSatish Choudhury Can the date field be restricted to past/today? It will help avoid this error - unless there is a reason to keep this unrestricted.
26 May 2020
10:58:16@_slack_openlmis_UBB6KN8JJ:matrix.orgWes
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_UGHGVT2TY:matrix.org
Hi Wes and joshzamor! As we were going to have a meeting to review reporting stack configuration issues this week - maybe it would be good to discuss it at Tech Committee Call? Or should I schedule a separate meeting instead?
I would vote for a separate meeting, this seems like it would take up a lot of the tech committee call and may not be all that technical (it seems more about timelines and strategies to fit the work in)
12:14:00@_slack_openlmis_B7JF9KDNK:matrix.orgtwitter @OpenLMIS: Thanks @wef for recognizing that "Reliance on paper-based records and lack of data visibility have made existing supply chains vulnerable to any pandemic". Digital tools like #OpenLMIS can support supply chain data digitization
12:17:04@_slack_openlmis_B7JF9KDNK:matrix.orgtwitter @OpenLMIS: The latest from the WHO on the COVID-19 global emergency supply chain; how it works and how to plug in: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/how-who-is-re-imagining-and-fixing-the-links-in-the-supply-chains-during-covid-19
15:37:29@_slack_openlmis_UB9E8UV89:matrix.orgJoannaS changed their profile picture.

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room List