| 29 Jul 2020 |
 RSS Bot [@hubert:uhoreg.ca] | Debian package news for nheko:
lintian reports <a href="https://lintian.debian.org/sources/nheko.html">1 warning</a> | 12:36:34 |
| RSS Bot [@hubert:uhoreg.ca] | Debian package news for quaternion:
lintian reports <a href="https://lintian.debian.org/sources/quaternion.html">2 warnings</a> | 12:37:36 |
 emorrp1 | #oftc#debian-social:matrix.org is in the process of setting up an instance :) | 20:56:58 |
 uhoreg | An instance of ... synapse? | 20:58:31 |
|  Henry-Nicolas Tourneur left the room. | 20:59:47 |
| emorrp1 | apologies, yes, synapse | 21:04:22 |
| 30 Jul 2020 |
| RSS Bot [@hubert:uhoreg.ca] | Debian package news for matrix-synapse:
A new upstream version is available: <a href="https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/archive/v1.18.0rc2.tar.gz">1.18.0~rc2</a> | 01:35:31 |
|  identity2 joined the room. | 05:06:03 |
|  kenobi joined the room. | 07:20:34 |
|  ogre_magi joined the room. | 10:38:10 |
|  tar joined the room. | 12:18:29 |
|  benpa changed their display name from benpa to benpa-matrix. | 13:06:34 |
| 31 Jul 2020 |
 davo | Would it be worth adding python3-sentry-sdk to the matrix-synapse Suggests? | 04:20:21 |
| emorrp1 | "exclusively required by unit test code." so seems it would be better off in autopkgtests? | 08:48:50 |
| davo | it's required if you add sentry to your config as well | 08:50:17 |
| emorrp1 | Fair enough, seems reasonable if it has built in support | 08:55:56 |
|  nan0 left the room. | 11:35:01 |
|  Duke changed their display name from duke to Duke. | 19:12:41 |
| Duke set a profile picture. | 19:14:56 |
| 2 Aug 2020 |
| emorrp1 | andrewsh: I know 0.99 was a bit of a special case, but is the security support going to be a problem for buster? | 14:22:46 |
| emorrp1 | have you had discussions with upstream about possibly having annual LTS releases at the end of the year? | 14:23:49 |
| emorrp1 | hmm, debian soft freeze is 12th Feb, ubuntu import freeze is 27th Feb, so actually looks like they could do LTS releases at Christmas or January | 14:29:39 |
| emorrp1 | * andrewsh: I know 0.99 was a bit of a special case, but is the security support going to be a problem for bullseye? | 14:30:57 |
|  lara joined the room. | 16:51:52 |
|  ghotam | 18:45:40 |
| 4 Aug 2020 |
 Linda | In reply to @emorrp1:freedombox.emorrp1.name
andrewsh: I know 0.99 was a bit of a special case, but is the security support going to be a problem for bullseye? yes, don't think the one in stable has one security patch because of major architectural differences in software and upstream wasn't interested to backport | 07:35:41 |
| Linda | In reply to @emorrp1:freedombox.emorrp1.name
andrewsh: I know 0.99 was a bit of a special case, but is the security support going to be a problem for bullseye? * yes, don't think the one in stable to have one security patch because of major architectural differences in software and upstream wasn't interested to backport | 07:36:00 |
| 5 Aug 2020 |
| emorrp1 | upstream, or at least matthew, seems very pro debian so I wouldn't be surprised if they're willing to align release schedules | 02:01:02 |
|  roland joined the room. | 12:31:42 |
|  fancycade left the room. | 20:22:59 |
