16 Feb 2019 |
Linda | My brain hurts, I don't want to think more about it | 00:24:10 |
Linda | Even debconf-devel(7) man page implies to check "true" or "false" . | 00:24:59 |
Linda | asfsaag | 00:25:08 |
Linda | stop, Linda | 00:25:09 |
Maximus | yes Linda, stop and enjoy your weekend! | 00:26:11 |
Maximus | let me be mad for you :) | 00:26:19 |
Linda | Dunno if this can use dpkg-maintscript-helper , probably not | 00:27:17 |
| Aksel left the room. | 02:03:11 |
Linda | Eh, Debian's own package in unstable does the same. | 00:36:07 |
Linda | I thought I removed the software-properties-common dependency, but guess not. | 03:45:51 |
Linda | Gone from +debian0.11 . | 03:47:46 |
Linda | I'm also not sure yet how Multi-Arch: field works for debian/control files. I found the following links:
- https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec#Dependencies_involving_Architecture:_all_packages
I also looked at debian-archive-keyring and it uses Multi-Arch: foreign , but I am not certain at all how using it would apply to matrix-archive-keyring .
andrewsh, do you know? | 06:12:57 |
Linda | s/links/URIs/ | 06:13:19 |
andrewsh | Foreign is a correct value for an all package | 08:38:58 |
Maximus | Linda: do you have a public repo or something I can use to keep myself up-to-date with your package? | 18:52:07 |
Linda | Maximus: I don't have a salsa.debian.org account at this time or write access to the Matrix Packaging Team's organization there.
debdiff can help with comparing versions, diffoscope with even greater detail in source tarballs. Debian Bug#922155 is the ITP bug, where I've posted the latest source code tarball (+debian0.10 ).
I don't expect there to be changes in features now, only code cleanups and making it behave better to Debian Policy (e.g., not overwriting configs with user changes without asking first). | 18:56:22 |
Linda | The ITP bug should have +debian1 version eventually, after that keeping up to date is apt upgrade . | 18:58:52 |
Maximus | Linda: Would it be a problem if I keep a gitlab version of your code with a script to build it to make it easier for myself, and make it a public for others to use if they want? or would you rather it's not hosted by anyone else, or not hosted on gitlab/github (I also have a self-hosted gitlab/gitea I could use) | 19:16:00 |
Linda | It's free software (GPLv3+), as long as you can comply with the license conditions all OK. | 19:29:12 |
Linda | Redacted or Malformed Event | 19:29:25 |
Linda | See debian/copyright in source tarball for details. | 19:29:37 |
Linda | s/can/will/ | 19:32:21 |
Maximus | Sure, just wanted to be sure it was ok to re-host your work as maybe it was an explicit choice not to do so with a git-based website | 19:42:52 |
Linda | Git doesn't fit into my workflow at this time with this package, sorry. | 19:43:24 |
Linda | I'd like to, after +debian1 . | 19:43:59 |
Maximus | No need to be sorry, I'm happy to be the git person for it :) If you send me the source in the same format everytime, I can take care of the rest | 19:44:12 |
Linda | It may be a team upload to Salsa later. | 19:45:24 |
Linda | I'm also open to an idea of co-maintaining, if that interests you. | 19:47:15 |
Linda | Later (once uploaded) I hope getting the source will be as easy as:
cd $HOME/.local/src/
apt source matrix-archive-keyring
# cd and other debuild stuff, if you want to build it too
| 19:49:02 |
Maximus | Sure :) | 19:51:24 |