!bNmDVJJJAHsdKuNIHn:matrix.org

Fedora Test Day

95 Members
Podman 2024-03-20: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-03-20_Podman_Desktop | Podman 5 2024-03-21: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-03-21_Podman_5 | Kernel 6.8 Test Week 2024-03-24: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-03-24_Kernel_6.8_Test_Week12 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
20 Mar 2024
@adamwill:fedora.imadamwhow about that?14:59:12
@mroche:fedora.imMike Rochefort changed their profile picture.23:13:20
21 Mar 2024
@mohanboddu:fedora.immboddu joined the room.14:04:30
@plugs3501:matrix.orgplugs joined the room.15:40:25
24 Mar 2024
@hricky:fedora.imHristo Marinov Hi, I have a question about the kernel-tests app. Where can I ask? 16:36:06
@jforbes:fedora.imjforbeshricky: here is good22:03:29
@hricky:fedora.imHristo MarinovFirst, I hope you are well!22:17:00
@hricky:fedora.imHristo Marinov Basically, when executing the script kernel-tests/runtests.sh the app raises an fedora.client.AuthError: Invalid request if I try to submit the results with my username and password. They are correct as I can submit my log files to https://kerneltest.fedoraproject.org/ manually. I can also submit them anonymously from within the app. I'm probably missing something, but I'm quite sure it worked the last time I used it. Please let me know if the issue is known, and if not, should I try to describe it more precisely and/or file it? 22:19:43
25 Mar 2024
@jforbes:fedora.imjforbeshricky: it did work last time, the server side was rewritten to work with modern Fedora infrastructure, and the change to modern auth killed the authenticated script11:41:29
@jforbes:fedora.imjforbesIt will hopefully be fixed at some point soon. ryanlerch did the rewrite and was looking into a fix for the script. Manually uploading logs to the site while logged in still works11:43:05
@jforbes:fedora.imjforbesAnd I appreciate it. I am doing very well given the circumstance. My recovery is going great.11:44:10
@hricky:fedora.imHristo Marinov jforbes: I'm glad you're doing great.
Looking at the code, I assumed it was as you say, but thought I'd note it anyway. I'm not good with Python at the moment, but I'm thinking of learning it and if I can contribute more in the future.
During test weeks, I don't see many Raspberry Pi tests. Also, is it useful to run kernel tests more regularly and send the results through the application?
13:15:43
@jforbes:fedora.imjforbes Hristo Marinov: Yes, it is always good to get results from real hardware. 13:16:58
@sithuw:fedora.imsithu w joined the room.15:07:19
26 Mar 2024
@sithuw:fedora.imsithu wHi everyone, This is my first time joining to Test Day. I will run the kernel Test with USB bootable method. Do I need to run dnf update before I run runtests.sh?05:35:53
@jforbes:fedora.imjforbessithuw: you do not13:56:02
@sithuw:fedora.imsithu w jforbes: thanks 14:29:25
@kurtbw:matrix.orgKurt Weinschenker joined the room.14:45:02
@kurtbw:matrix.orgKurt WeinschenkerHi there. First time joining test day. Regression test ran okay, submitted results. As I attempt to run the performance test suite, the computer hangs -- unless it's supposed to take two+ hours to run the "bandwidth measurement" module. Am I on the right track here, or did the performance suite hang?14:48:29
@kurtbw:matrix.orgKurt WeinschenkerHmmm. A little more digging, and it appears someone has filed a bug in Bugzilla on this. See bug 2271375, apparently filed as part of this week's test week. I can leave this machine up and running. It's running from the USB stick. So I'll keep the terminal window open for a bit yet, and see what happens.15:00:34
@hricky:fedora.imHristo MarinovI can confirm from my experience that the performance test can take about an hour on some machines.15:01:32
@kurtbw:matrix.orgKurt WeinschenkerI'm at two and a half hours here, so I'll keep it open and going to see what happens.15:02:29
@kurtbw:matrix.orgKurt WeinschenkerWell. To wrap up this little part of my thread, I went off to lunch at a service club, leaving the machine running. After roughly five hours and 50 minutes, it finished. Perhaps it might prove helpful for others to know the performance test suite can take hours to run, as a matter of managing people's expectations. Thank you to all for listening, I'll now attempt to submit my test results on the wiki. Best wishes.17:45:00
@hricky:fedora.imHristo MarinovOut of interest, could you share the hardware configuration of this machine?18:02:32
@kurtbw:matrix.orgKurt WeinschenkerSure. From the Settings module: Fedora Linux 39 (Workstation Edition). HP ProBook 450 G2. Intel® Core™ i5-4210U × 4. 8.0 GB RAM. Intel® HD Graphics 4400 (HSW GT2). Firmware (latest released by HP): M74 Ver. 01.54. 64-bit OS. Gnome 45.5 running under Wayland. Kernel: Linux 6.8.1-201.fc39.x86_64. Hope this is what you need. I appreciate the work everyone does. Again, best wishes.18:08:08
@kurtbw:matrix.orgKurt WeinschenkerWelp, I guess I sent the software configuration as well... no harm, no foul!18:09:22
@jforbes:fedora.imjforbeskurtbw: thanks for the update. Yeah, the performance tests are really aimed at higher spec machines, but most importantly, they really only offer interesting insight when comparing the same machine across multiple releases.19:18:23
@jforbes:fedora.imjforbesEveryone's machine has different specs, etc. so looking at the logs on the performance tests is not particularly interesting. But if someone comes to me and says 6.8.1 is 20% slower on these tests on the same machine compared to 6.7.x, that is worth looking into19:19:38
27 Mar 2024
@bittin:fedora.imLuna Jernbergdone with the 6.8.2 Fedora 39 and 40 Beta kernel testing07:56:04
@hricky:fedora.imHristo Marinov

Hi,
I think there is an inaccuracy in the QA:Testcase toolbox wiki page.

The command
skopeo copy docker-archive:Fedora-Container-Toolbox.x86_64-40-1.10.oci.tar.xz containers-storage:registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora-toolbox:40
returns
FATA[0057] initializing source docker-archive:Fedora-Container-Toolbox.x86_64-40-1.10.oci.tar.xz: loading tar component manifest.json: file does not exist

The transport part of the IMAGE-NAME foramаt in the command is not correct. Instead of docker-archive it should be oci-archive since the tar archive is compliant with OCI Layout Specification. I think I can fix the page, but I'm not sure if that's the right thing to do, at least until the inaccuracy is further confirmed.

So please test out the edited command i.e., skopeo copy oci-archive:Fedora-Container-Toolbox.x86_64-40-1.10.oci.tar.xz containers-storage:registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora-toolbox:40

08:09:21

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 5