| 23 Apr 2024 |
 dkliban | i didn't run the code, but i did read over the changes. awesome feature! | 18:00:43 |
 ggainey | concur - approved! | 18:16:13 |
 Pedro Pessoa | the lack of tests is still something to be improved, but just for the records, part of the changes were suggested by mkdocs maintainers to get around a problem we had with infinite reload triggering. | 18:18:14 |
| Pedro Pessoa | thanks for the reviews | 18:18:42 |
| 24 Apr 2024 |
 lmjachky | In reply to @lubosmj:matrix.org
I have just released a compatible version: https://pypi.org/project/pulp-cli-ostree/#history, https://github.com/pulp/pulp-cli-ostree/blob/0.3/pulp-glue-ostree/pyproject.toml#L26 hmm, I am now not sure if you can install pulp-cli-ostree with pulp-glue==0.25 if we have this requirement "pulp-cli>=0.20.0,<0.25" in pulp-cli-ostree (https://github.com/pulp/pulp-cli-ostree/blob/cd910a9a5170fba25ab0a56f09136ecc209fc5b1/pyproject.toml#L26) and pulp-cli 0.24 pins pulp-glue to 0.24: https://github.com/pulp/pulp-cli/blob/d44e0e4f5dd3c9985cdd7c6e88070b7cd4798585/pyproject.toml#L26 | 09:13:39 |
| lmjachky | In reply to @lubosmj:matrix.org
I have just released a compatible version: https://pypi.org/project/pulp-cli-ostree/#history, https://github.com/pulp/pulp-cli-ostree/blob/0.3/pulp-glue-ostree/pyproject.toml#L26 * hmm, I am now not sure if you can install pulp-cli-ostree with pulp-glue==0.25 if we have this requirement "pulp-cli>=0.20.0,<0.25" in pulp-cli-ostree (https://github.com/pulp/pulp-cli-ostree/blob/cd910a9a5170fba25ab0a56f09136ecc209fc5b1/pyproject.toml#L26) and pulp-cli 0.24 pins pulp-glue to 0.24: https://github.com/pulp/pulp-cli/blob/d44e0e4f5dd3c9985cdd7c6e88070b7cd4798585/pyproject.toml#L26
I am doing another release...
| 10:18:30 |
 Zhenech | x9c4: curious, why was a "custom" collation needed in https://github.com/pulp/pulp_ansible/pull/1572? | 11:40:56 |
| Zhenech | memorious: do I recall correctly, you were kinda responsible for packages.microsoft.com?
I'm getting E: Failed to fetch https://packages.microsoft.com/ubuntu/22.04/prod/dists/jammy/InRelease Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NOSPLIT' (does the network require authentication?) from there :/ | 12:10:16 |
| lmjachky | x9c4, are immediate tasks automatically deleted from the database after their completion? | 12:12:38 |
| Zhenech | In reply to @zhenech:matrix.org
memorious: do I recall correctly, you were kinda responsible for packages.microsoft.com?
I'm getting E: Failed to fetch https://packages.microsoft.com/ubuntu/22.04/prod/dists/jammy/InRelease Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NOSPLIT' (does the network require authentication?) from there :/ ah, it's been reported at https://github.com/microsoft/linux-package-repositories/issues/130 -- I'll watch there | 12:15:57 |
| ggainey | that looks painful :( | 12:53:43 |
 memorious | at least it wasn't our fault. the signing service failed to sign the file. | 13:16:00 |
| memorious | we republished and it should be fixed now. funny thing is we have a feature that we're rolling out today to check the signatures. | 13:16:46 |
| dkliban | memorious: could pulp have done anything to help recognize there was a problem iwth the signing service? | 13:16:49 |
| dkliban | memorious: is this a pulp feature you are rolling out? | 13:17:18 |
| memorious | no the signing service we have set up validates that the release file is signed. I suppose Pulp could do that--check if the repo metadata is in fact signed if a signing service is set. but each plugin would have to do this. | 13:18:24 |
| memorious | x9c4: could we file a task or open a PR to remove the multi expression filter out of tech preview? | 13:21:41 |
| ggainey | x9c4: gerrod sorry, FF had a seizure on me :( | 13:48:05 |
 gerrod | it's alright, we called the meeting early | 13:49:42 |
| ggainey | yeah, figured | 13:51:41 |
 ipanova | lmjachky: I finally managed to setup nfs | 15:40:24 |
| ipanova | and i think i will have bad news | 15:40:32 |
| ipanova | because it passed the mark of few minutes and the django-admin command is still running | 15:41:05 |
| ipanova | what i can say right away is that we should def add more logging. it's been running already for quite a while and i do not know if it is hang or not | 15:42:57 |
| ggainey | it's amazing how often "set up NFS" and "bad news" end up in the same sentence... :) | 15:43:01 |
| ipanova | sigh | 15:44:02 |
 decko | In reply to @ggainey:matrix.org
it's amazing how often "set up NFS" and "bad news" end up in the same sentence... :) which is a bad thing. I can't remember the last time I setup a Samba installation to share files between computers. | 17:16:38 |
| ipanova | lmjachky: we are roughly 4times slower https://github.com/pulp/pulp_container/issues/1573#issuecomment-2075468744 | 17:27:13 |
| lmjachky | In reply to @ipanova:matrix.org
lmjachky: we are roughly 4times slower https://github.com/pulp/pulp_container/issues/1573#issuecomment-2075468744 Can we read files in parallel to speed up the things? | 20:20:01 |
| lmjachky | Or, it does not have any impact and we are caped by the internet speed no matter what? | 20:24:22 |
