28 Dec 2018 |
Marcus (old) | *know | 12:30:26 |
mvdan | currently looking at https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/search.html#scope-issues | 12:32:56 |
mvdan | doesn't look like there's a way to sort issues | 12:33:04 |
mvdan | the UI doesn't have a revelance order at all | 12:33:14 |
mvdan | it does have a popularity order, but the API doesn't expose it | 12:33:35 |
mvdan | so I just don't think this is feasible with gitlab's api at the moment | 12:33:46 |
mvdan | e.g. what do we do if a search gives 13 issues | 12:34:02 |
mvdan | in any case, PRs welcome | 12:34:22 |
Marcus (old) | Thanks for looking into it. | 12:39:19 |
Marcus (old) | If you are fine with maintaining gibot for the moment I'd like to stay with it. | 12:40:07 |
mvdan | sure | 12:58:55 |
| [gibot] left the room. | 12:59:20 |
| [gibot] joined the room. | 12:59:33 |
mvdan | updated to master and the latest go version - checking that all still works... | 12:59:47 |
mvdan | c!724 | 13:00:06 |
[gibot] | [client] !724: "No internet" banner on main, categories, and up… - https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidclient/merge_requests/724 | 13:00:07 |
mvdan | client#1651 | 13:00:19 |
[gibot] | [client] #1651: Add repo not routed through Tor - https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidclient/issues/1651 | 13:00:20 |
mvdan | cool | 13:00:22 |
Nico Alt | mvdan: Can we somehow automatically include all repos in /fdroid? Otherwise I'll go through the list soon and make a PR. | 13:07:44 |
mvdan | I forget if the webhooks are set up for the entire org, or on a per-repo basis | 13:45:30 |
mvdan | if it's the former, notices could be done for all repos quite easily | 13:45:38 |
mvdan | stuff like reponame#12345 is a bit more tricky, because the config is what tells gibot which prefixes to look for | 13:46:08 |
Coffee | Anything newsworthy from the 35C3 meetup? | 14:05:09 |
mimi89999 | Hello | 14:17:20 |
mimi89999 | Do v2 signatures work fine with reproducible build now? | 14:17:40 |
mimi89999 | I remember that there was an issue with them, but didn't follow. | 14:18:00 |
Marcus (old) | In reply to @freenode_mimi89999:matrix.org Do v2 signatures work fine with reproducible build now? No, don't think so | 14:41:17 |
uniq | mimi89999: we don't have support for v2 signatures yet because they work different from v1 signatures | 15:06:16 |
uniq | no one looked into implementing v2 support yet I'm afraid | 15:07:29 |