| 20 Jun 2024 |
 emilgardis | It's already supported, just that the images need to be setup, infact however, most if not all already work for aarch64, we just need gha to support arm64 docker, and it seems like they've begun supporting it in enterprise teams | 23:59:50 |
| 21 Jun 2024 |
 valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | well, once they get this out i guess i wouldn't need cross anymore | 00:00:32 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | but like... they have taken four years to get it out since arm64 macs, i'm not expecting it to be GA anytime soon | 00:01:14 |
| emilgardis | Can I ask what you're trying to achieve? Maybe you don't really need to use cross in build context? | 00:01:55 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | In reply to @emilgardis:matrix.org
Can I ask what you're trying to achieve? Maybe you don't really need to use cross in build context? I'm trying to build a multi-arch image using github actions, but I'd like to do the actual building in the dockerfile, and not copy a prebuilt executable in. Unfortunately, github doesn't support arm64 runners. | 00:03:27 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | https://github.com/randomairborne/tinylevel/blob/58376b63b46e0ad6a9a2c37bbfaadfcf39eb74be/.github/workflows/build.yml This is unsustainable. | 00:03:53 |
| emilgardis | yeah gotcha, don't have a good solution for you then | 00:03:58 |
| emilgardis | what you could do is borrow our images which already have all the cross-compilation tools, except rust itself | 00:04:33 |
| emilgardis | so something like
ARG TARGET
FROM ghcr.io/cross-rs/$TARGET:edge as builder
RUN <install rustup>
RUN cargo build --target $TARGET --release ...
...
| 00:06:23 |
| emilgardis | * so something like
ARG TARGET
FROM ghcr.io/cross-rs/$TARGET:edge as builder
RUN <install rustup>
RUN cargo build --target $TARGET --release ...
...
| 00:06:28 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | I could probably build my own image based on that, as well, actually. | 00:06:56 |
| emilgardis | cross is nothing more than a fancy docker invoker | 00:07:03 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | yeah, i know that | 00:07:12 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | well, cross CLI is a fancy docker invoker, but the docker images are very useful | 00:07:33 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | In reply to @emilgardis:matrix.org
so something like
ARG TARGET
FROM ghcr.io/cross-rs/$TARGET:edge as builder
RUN <install rustup>
RUN cargo build --target $TARGET --release ...
...
might be a silly request, but is there some reason that image couldn't be provided as a different tag? Along the lines of cross-rs/edge-cargo? | 00:07:49 |
| emilgardis | not sure I follow, what should have a different tag? | 00:08:19 |
| emilgardis | edge = usually main = what's currently the newest ci image from a branch which ci builds | 00:08:59 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | Just the cross images with a rustup minimal profile lol | 00:09:07 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | not edge specifically | 00:09:10 |
| emilgardis | hmm, maybe, would eat up some more space but I'd be open to include that as an extra tagged image for our targets | 00:10:00 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | how much space are y'all alloted / how much are you using? | 00:10:26 |
| emilgardis | no clue, maybe it's unlimited? just on the normal open-source plan | 00:10:49 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | it says 500mb storage and 1gb egress | 00:11:59 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | but that might just be for private repos, because that seems like it could be used to rack up enormous bills for open source developers | 00:12:17 |
| emilgardis | that can't be it, we're definitely over that | 00:12:19 |
| emilgardis |
GitHub Packages usage is free for public packages
🥳
| 00:13:25 |
| emilgardis | *
GitHub Packages usage is free for public packages
🥳
| 00:13:32 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | Is that a feature y'all would want? Perhaps the tag could be ci or something like that. | 00:14:16 |
| emilgardis | if it's just a docker image like
ARG TARGET
FROM ghcr.io/cross-rs/$TARGET:edge as builder
RUN <install rustup>
i'm absolutely fine with it
| 00:15:58 |
| valkyrie_pilot 🏳️🌈 | well, we have to decide what color to paint the bikeshed /j | 00:16:22 |
