29 Aug 2019 |
Joshua Boniface | i keep pushing it out of my mind | 20:51:22 |
Joshua Boniface | and if we get rid of stupid iso mounting, then maybe we can remove some of those sudoers permissions on Linux! | 20:51:56 |
Bond_009 | It still has a Plugin class | 20:51:58 |
Joshua Boniface | win win win | 20:51:58 |
JustAMan | Joshua Boniface: can we declare plugins that have restrictions like OS in repo manifest? | 20:52:48 |
Joshua Boniface | hrm, i don't know | 20:53:07 |
Joshua Boniface | i didn't recall seeing such a field, but maybne | 20:53:13 |
JustAMan | Cause mount plugin is for Linux only and rar2fs would be x86 linux only unless unrar exists for other archs | 20:53:22 |
JustAMan | Thus we should not allow installation of them, but should show user a message why we disallow it | 20:53:53 |
Joshua Boniface | we could just change it to "reads isos" though, and be cross platform? | 20:53:55 |
JustAMan | For iso plugin yes, if there's a lib | 20:54:13 |
JustAMan | There should be, as iso is simple | 20:54:22 |
Joshua Boniface | ok | 20:54:32 |
JustAMan | Bond_009: what do you think, would this work? https://formats.kaitai.io/iso9660/csharp.html | 20:57:15 |
JustAMan | That thing even has rar format lol | 20:58:02 |
JustAMan | https://formats.kaitai.io/rar/csharp.html | 20:58:17 |
Bond_009 | In reply to @justaman:matrix.org Bond_009: what do you think, would this work? https://formats.kaitai.io/iso9660/csharp.html It could... I think | 21:00:58 |
JustAMan | I am on phone now, cannot check license properly and what the code is | 21:01:58 |
JustAMan | But it might be interesting | 21:02:03 |
| DexDeadly joined the room. | 21:04:23 |
Bond_009 | https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin-plugin-isomounter
Repo is done | 21:09:37 |
Bond_009 | Build currently fails because of incompatibility with the 10.3.* nuget packages | 21:10:19 |
Bond_009 | https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/pull/1687 | 21:12:54 |
ttechy | So I was looking at the jellyfin-kodi addon about adding HTTP Basic Auth support and I noticed that a part of building the http headers includes a function which is adding a bunch of stuff to the "Authorization" header, I assume for the server to use as identification of the client | 21:13:54 |
ttechy | Since this header is needed for the basic auth support I was wondering if the server could get this information from a different header ? | 21:14:45 |
sparky | No | 21:23:06 |
| DexDeadly left the room. | 21:23:08 |
sparky | Currently its all one giant emby specific header iirc | 21:23:32 |
ttechy | Yeah I tried hardcoding the Auth header into the code and it connects okay but it won't let you sign in | 21:28:26 |
ttechy | Is there plans to change this identification header to something else ? | 21:29:10 |