!WvhHfzeVtuCUzHOonZ:envs.net

envs

300 Members
official channel for envs.net ~ place to be | space: #space:envs.net | news: #news:envs.net | status: #status:envs.net | lounge (offtopic chat): #lounge:envs.net | help: https://help.envs.net | etiquette: https://envs.net/chat/etiquette62 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
18 Feb 2024
@creme:envs.net~creme
In reply to @myxi:envs.net
is there some way to run hugo version 122 or above? their docs stipulate running this version for even the quickstart example, and I'm running into issues doing the commands with the current version:
[ myxi@envs.net ]~[ /home/myxi/trash/quickstart ]                                                                                                         [ 06:55:09 ]
$ hugo version
hugo v0.109.0-47b12b83e636224e5e601813ff3e6790c191e371 linux/amd64 BuildDate=2022-12-23T10:38:11Z VendorInfo=gohugoio
it gives me like five warnings when I try to generate and there's no index.html generated, just the xml files
$ hugo
Start building sites …
hugo v0.109.0-47b12b83e636224e5e601813ff3e6790c191e371 linux/amd64 BuildDate=2022-12-23T10:38:11Z VendorInfo=gohugoio
WARN 2024/02/18 06:56:45 found no layout file for "HTML" for kind "taxonomy": You should create a template file which matches Hugo Layouts Lookup Rules for this combination.
WARN 2024/02/18 06:56:45 found no layout file for "HTML" for kind "page": You should create a template file which matches Hugo Layouts Lookup Rules for this combination.
WARN 2024/02/18 06:56:45 found no layout file for "HTML" for kind "taxonomy": You should create a template file which matches Hugo Layouts Lookup Rules for this combination.
WARN 2024/02/18 06:56:45 found no layout file for "HTML" for kind "home": You should create a template file which matches Hugo Layouts Lookup Rules for this combination.
is updated now.
07:29:37
@myxi:envs.netmyxiwow, thanks!07:49:59
@creme:envs.net~cremeyw08:00:27
@myxi:envs.netmyxi Some good looking themes require the extended version of hugo,
Error: error building site: TOCSS: failed to transform "css/main.scss" (text/x-scss). Check your Hugo installation; you need the extended version to build SCSS/SASS with transpiler set to 'libsass'.: this feature is not available in your current Hugo version, see https://goo.gl/YMrWcn for more information
I am getting that error when I try to build my site when I try to use certain themes. More info: https://gohugo.io/hugo-pipes/transpile-sass-to-css/#options
11:01:46
@myxi:envs.netmyxi Some good looking themes require the extended version of hugo,
Error: error building site: TOCSS: failed to transform "css/main.scss" (text/x-scss). Check your Hugo installation; you need the extended version to build SCSS/SASS with transpiler set to 'libsass'.: this feature is not available in your current Hugo version, see https://goo.gl/YMrWcn for more information
I am getting that error when I try to build my site when I try to use certain themes. More info: https://gohugo.io/hugo-pipes/transpile-sass-to-css/#options

any help?
11:01:55
@myxi:envs.netmyxi Some good looking themes (latest one I tried was m10c) require the extended version of hugo,
Error: error building site: TOCSS: failed to transform "css/main.scss" (text/x-scss). Check your Hugo installation; you need the extended version to build SCSS/SASS with transpiler set to 'libsass'.: this feature is not available in your current Hugo version, see https://goo.gl/YMrWcn for more information
I am getting that error when I try to build my site when I try to use certain themes. More info: https://gohugo.io/hugo-pipes/transpile-sass-to-css/#options

any help?
11:02:31
@creme:envs.net~creme
In reply to @myxi:envs.net
Some good looking themes (latest one I tried was m10c) require the extended version of hugo,
Error: error building site: TOCSS: failed to transform "css/main.scss" (text/x-scss). Check your Hugo installation; you need the extended version to build SCSS/SASS with transpiler set to 'libsass'.: this feature is not available in your current Hugo version, see https://goo.gl/YMrWcn for more information
I am getting that error when I try to build my site when I try to use certain themes. More info: https://gohugo.io/hugo-pipes/transpile-sass-to-css/#options

any help?
try it again. i installed hugo_extended now.
11:55:25
@myxi:envs.netmyxiit worked, thanks!11:56:04
@github:envs.netGithub [envs-net/0x0] NEK-RA starred the repo 11:58:00
@calico:cat.casaTricolored Ball of Fluff changed their display name from calico to Ball of Fluff.14:29:20
@calico:cat.casaTricolored Ball of Fluff removed their display name Ball of Fluff.14:38:19
@calico:cat.casaTricolored Ball of Fluff set their display name to Ball of Fluff.14:52:21
@ivsbat:envs.net@ivsbat:envs.net left the room.15:38:10
19 Feb 2024
@calico:cat.casaTricolored Ball of Fluff removed their display name Ball of Fluff.02:46:59
@calico:cat.casaTricolored Ball of Fluff set their display name to Tricolored Ball of Fluff.02:52:21
@oliverpool:envs.netoliverpool joined the room.08:22:46
@compositr:chat.compositr.devcompositr joined the room.10:49:57
@flamion:matrix.orgflamion
In reply to @seirdy:seirdy.one
pretty sure the main reason no longer applies so i demoted it to fed-tl-removal
One thing that might come to my mind is, I noticed that mastodon.art has blocked us and a lot of other instances seem/seemed to import their blocklist
18:51:05
20 Feb 2024
@cauterize:envs.netcauterize joined the room.12:09:14
@cauterize:envs.netcauterize set a profile picture.12:14:22
@loowiz:envs.netloowiz joined the room.20:07:39
@seirdy:seirdy.oneSeirdy
In reply to @myxi:envs.net
is there some way to run hugo version 122 or above? their docs stipulate running this version for even the quickstart example, and I'm running into issues doing the commands with the current version:
[ myxi@envs.net ]~[ /home/myxi/trash/quickstart ]                                                                                                         [ 06:55:09 ]
$ hugo version
hugo v0.109.0-47b12b83e636224e5e601813ff3e6790c191e371 linux/amd64 BuildDate=2022-12-23T10:38:11Z VendorInfo=gohugoio
it gives me like five warnings when I try to generate and there's no index.html generated, just the xml files
fair warning, hugo 0.123 makes a lot of breaking changes.
19:31:50
@loowiz:envs.netloowizHi! Just recently joined Envs and was wondering if there are any plans to possibly migrate from Gitea to Forgejo? It looks like its gonna be harder to migrate later on due to the fairly recent decision to hard fork. Just wondering :)21:02:25
21 Feb 2024
@creme:envs.net~creme
In reply to @loowiz:envs.net
Hi! Just recently joined Envs and was wondering if there are any plans to possibly migrate from Gitea to Forgejo? It looks like its gonna be harder to migrate later on due to the fairly recent decision to hard fork. Just wondering :)
there is no plan and reason to migrate from Gitea to Forgejo.
05:00:21
@loowiz:envs.netloowiz I would argue that while currently, I'd agree there is no reason seeing as they are very similar projects. However with Gitea being now owned by a for-profit, they may make changes in the future that are not in the public interest, as opposed to Forgejo having public governance. The advantage of switching now is that it will likely be a lot easier than it would be by the time that change happens.
~loowiz
07:46:25
@oliverpool:envs.netoliverpoolForgejo plans a security release tomorrow: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/security-announcements/issues/6 The security posture of Gitea is far from perfect: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/86 (Disclaimer: I am involved in the development of Forgejo - not in the security team)07:56:37
@bkil:matrix.orgbkilmI hate to be the naysayer against decentralization and power to the people, but I'd like to note that GitLab is similarly backed by a commercial company (up to even including a feature packed pro tier) and everybody had been satisfied with it for a decade now.12:03:03
@bkil:matrix.orgbkilmBy everyone I mean the various FOSS organizations, institutions and hobbists self-hosting it. It may be indeed more resource intensive than some other competitors (such as Gitea/Forgejo), but they did not exist back then - that wasn't my point above.12:04:30
@loowiz:envs.netloowizI wouldn't say that Gitea will definitely become the worse alternative due to the commercial takeover, just that i believe it is more likely than Forgejo to become the worse alternative and seeing how easy it seems, currently, to migrate (https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/admin/installation/), I don't see much of a reason to stay with Gitea13:20:22
@github:envs.netGithub [envs-net/matrix-doc] cremesk pushed 1 commit to master: 15:26:21

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10