| 25 Nov 2023 |
 ddapp | * am thinking it's nice zone owner can change their pricing strategy by taking in the plaintext name and block name registrations (eg revert based on length), and avoid adding proxy (to me it's a little complex); code below
totally agree with you rootzone doesn't need to change, the rootzone governor can manually grant tld and that is all the object does
the reason is, as per ens, thinking there would be one tld eg dmp so there is no collision with tlds in DNS
thinking it'd be nice dpaths can be used in browser as URI (need a flag somewhere to state if the URI name is mutable or not); so eg v1.rico.dmp.limo/im.
* But DNS should be preferred last, and cross checking multiple ethereum RPC for dpath resolution should be first preferred. Thinking out loud here
wdyt? : )
function assume(bytes32 salt, bytes32 name, string calldata plain) external {
require(owners[name] == address(0), "ERR_TAKEN");
require(keccak256(abi.encode(plain)) == name, "ERR_NAME");
bytes32 comm = keccak256(abi.encode(salt, name, msg.sender));
require(commitments[comm] >= Appraiser(appraiser).appraise(plain), "ERR_PAYMENT"); // appraiser is upgradeable by zone owner
commitments[comm] = 0;
owners[name] = msg.sender;
emit Assume(name, plain);
emit Transfer(address(0), msg.sender, name);
}
| 02:49:25 |
| ddapp | * In reply to 🍠kbrav
Wrt deferring pricing (there doesn’t necessarily have to be any at all) think you could just have an upgradeable proxy as the zone, idk that there’d need to be a rootzone update for that. But curious to hear thots
am thinking it's nice zone owner can change their pricing strategy by taking in the plaintext name and block name registrations (eg revert based on length), and avoid adding proxy (to me it's a little complex); code below
totally agree with you rootzone doesn't need to change, the rootzone governor can manually grant tld and that is all the object does
the reason is, as per ens, thinking there would be one tld eg dmp so there is no collision with tlds in DNS
thinking it'd be nice dpaths can be used in browser as URI (need a flag somewhere to state if the URI name is mutable or not); so eg v1.rico.dmp.limo/im.
But DNS should be preferred last, and cross checking multiple ethereum RPC for dpath resolution should be first preferred. Thinking out loud here
wdyt? : )
```
function assume(bytes32 salt, bytes32 name, string calldata plain) external {
require(owners[name] == address(0), "ERR_TAKEN");
require(keccak256(abi.encode(plain)) == name, "ERR_NAME");
bytes32 comm = keccak256(abi.encode(salt, name, msg.sender));
require(commitments[comm] >= Appraiser(appraiser).appraise(plain), "ERR_PAYMENT"); // appraiser is upgradeable by zone owner
commitments[comm] = 0;
owners[name] = msg.sender;
emit Assume(name, plain);
emit Transfer(address(0), msg.sender, name);
}
``` | 02:49:55 |
 kbrav | Ah ok so it’s rootzone except with custom appraiser that can be set by owner? | 03:07:57 |
| kbrav | The idea is that this is a different protocol so i don’t think we’d have to worry about dns collision generally | 03:14:03 |
| kbrav | Like there’s no TLD that points to a network of eth rpcs | 03:15:36 |
 sheikhkebab | why | 03:20:10 |
| ddapp | In reply to @kbrav:matrix.org
Ah ok so it’s rootzone except with custom appraiser that can be set by owner? Yep, every zone can have an appraiser if the owner chooses, including rootzone because ya doesn't make sense to use DNS when dmp tries to replace DNS | 03:36:30 |
| ddapp | In reply to @sheikhkebab:matrix.org
why Hi, which part? | 03:37:06 |
| ddapp | In reply to @kbrav:matrix.org
Ah ok so it’s rootzone except with custom appraiser that can be set by owner? * Yep, every zone can have an appraiser if the owner chooses, including rootzone because ya doesn't make sense to use DNS when dmap tries to replace DNS | 05:28:42 |
| kbrav | i think he's asking me | 07:09:46 |
| kbrav | because ICANN doesnt like our stupid coins | 07:10:24 |
| sheikhkebab | fuck icann | 08:08:25 |
| kbrav | worldstar | 08:09:03 |
| sheikhkebab | I always thought dmap was a delegation protocol | 08:14:33 |
| kbrav | for identity? yeah that's one application | 08:15:49 |
| kbrav | anything where it's useful to map stuff you know to stuff you don't know | 08:19:34 |
| 26 Nov 2023 |
| ddapp | Redacted or Malformed Event | 01:50:22 |
| ddapp | * Isn't using ipfs gateway to get a cid's content a false sense of security? If the DNS or the gateway are hacked....
Literally just bookmarking a hash, hash the code, then compare before using the code, you'd close all the network related attack surface in theory [1]? Feel free to correct
[1]: Im figuring out why uniswap interface would fetch js files ... What's the point of them uploading to ipfs if their frontend loads more code over network? | 01:51:16 |
| ddapp | * Isn't using ipfs gateway to get a cid's content a false sense of security? If the DNS or the gateway are hacked...., I assume nothing on the browser side checks the CID
Literally just bookmarking a hash, hash the code, then compare before using the code, you'd close all the network related attack surface in theory [1]? Feel free to correct
[1]: Im figuring out why uniswap interface would fetch js files ... What's the point of them uploading to ipfs if their frontend loads more code over network? | 01:54:42 |
| 1 Dec 2023 |
|  lasthayek joined the room. | 12:46:38 |
| 2 Dec 2023 |
| kbrav | would be really cool as a starting thing if we could just type in a couple commands with a dpath to download all the type info as well as UI and docs for a protocol, forget if i mentioned. that was kind of long term vision type stuffs when we put dmap/dpack on hold | 01:32:25 |
| kbrav | I say "starting thing" just because most people will want one command or even no commands and a LOC. the more ergo it gets the better | 01:35:05 |
|  @splessnosi:matrix.org left the room. | 18:16:15 |
| 8 Dec 2023 |
| kbrav | i think one of Rico's greatest strengths is in how apolitical it is | 20:30:27 |
| kbrav | someone asked me what's different compared to another project that's also a Dai fork | 20:31:09 |
| kbrav | I think one of the really crucial things is having a clear definition of what these financial instruments are supposed to be | 20:31:35 |
| kbrav | I think there'll be a few different takes on that and there already have been but mine is "stable-value credibly neutral debt unit" | 20:32:16 |
| kbrav | And you can kind of go from there because that's such a bare bones, fundamental definition and if you really meditate on what it means and what its value is and how to check that small number of boxes then you can come to some new conclusions that can significantly change the approach | 20:34:02 |
| kbrav | Forex what is credible neutrality, what's it's value, and how does the tech provide it? There are different overlapping answers but if you focus too much on the ones with certain political slants then you can miss others that are also really enlightening. Something for everyone here | 20:38:15 |
| kbrav | The idea is you fork Dai, and you think really hard about what this is supposed to be at the core, determine what's unnecessary or counterproductive or makes things less flexible etc, and refactor or strip it away until you have this really small piece of code that you can make neutral in new ways | 20:43:13 |
