!UmyxSUfZGshMuHqkog:matrix.org

WebKitGTK

199 Members
Discussion about the WebKitGTK port — https://webkitgtk.org29 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
4 Mar 2024
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)
In reply to @mcatanzaro:gnome.org
I would start with the highest component you're confident in (probably WebKit); bug reports can always move downwards
honestly not really interested at this point
17:54:24
@mcatanzaro:gnome.orgMichael CatanzaroOuch, well it won't be fixed without a bug report :(17:55:36
@mcatanzaro:gnome.orgMichael CatanzaroBut I guess you know it probably won't be fixed even if you do report it :P so fair enough...17:56:03
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)
In reply to @mcatanzaro:gnome.org
But I guess you know it probably won't be fixed even if you do report it :P so fair enough...
yes
18:37:29
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)because no one could reproduce it and basically no one helped when I was asking for ideas for debugging18:37:42
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)meanwhile I need a usable browser18:37:49
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)so...18:37:51
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)maybe at some point I'll return to it, tho well, I'm also spending more time on highscore now, which I was neglecting before18:38:27
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)so I don't think I'd have resources anyway18:38:33
@mcatanzaro:gnome.orgMichael CatanzaroAnd it's not a regression, right? It's just always been this bad?18:38:51
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)so better if I just remove myself from doap than constantly getting annoyed at random ui changes18:38:53
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)
In reply to @mcatanzaro:gnome.org
And it's not a regression, right? It's just always been this bad?
it is a regression, but I don't know when it started
18:39:01
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)other than: at some point I tried nightly after a few months of not doing so and it was bad18:39:13
@mcatanzaro:gnome.orgMichael CatanzaroIf it's a regression, then it is bisectable18:39:18
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)(I usually use stable because - well, I need usable browser)18:39:23
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)
In reply to @mcatanzaro:gnome.org
If it's a regression, then it is bisectable
well the thing is
18:39:35
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)it might also have always been there and my network configuration changed a bit18:39:45
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)like18:39:45
@mcatanzaro:gnome.orgMichael CatanzaroStable flatpak should get my glib-networking fix pretty soon, nightly has it already18:39:46
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)that video is from nightly18:39:57
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)so no18:39:58
@mcatanzaro:gnome.orgMichael Catanzaro
In reply to @alexm:gnome.org
it might also have always been there and my network configuration changed a bit
So you don't know whether or not it is a regression :)
18:40:00
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)well, I know that it looks like a regression on my end18:40:08
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)whether it's software or network equipment - idk18:40:15
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)because the thing is18:40:20
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)it's always been really reallly bad unless connection is excellent18:40:29
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)while firefox generally doesn't struggle18:40:33
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)so if it got worse, say, on isp end - it would be noticeable18:40:54
@alexm:gnome.orgAlice (she/her)but I have no way to test that18:40:59
@mcatanzaro:gnome.orgMichael CatanzaroAnyway, bisected problems do generally get fixed, so worth checking to see whether it's bisectable IMO. If some old version works but the newer stuff doesn't...18:41:39

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6