But whom would the conflict ultimately benefit?

What's wrong with Russia keeping the Crimean naval dockyards for its Black Sea Fleet? Truly Nato is the aggressor on the Earth today.

Ought we consider the wider hemispheric strategic view of Nato's desire to make the peoples of the free world obsolete with automation and AI?

All surveillance is simply a sea data for machine learning to suck up and AI to learn to become more proficient at its task.

Self driving cars will be the first step towards a society asleep at the wheel driving headlong into the demise of their beautiful biped hominid form, cosmetically upgrading themselves into zombie drones. Not so much augmented intelligence but a fleet of sensors communicating back to their particular AI overlord that stewards their hearts and minds on their own behalf.

So, Yemen? Central Asia and western China are known to have deposits of rare earths, cobalt and lithium.

Is the target of any future conflict in Yemen actually the Russian Federation's eleven time zones of contiguous territory?

A Nathan de Rothschild and House of Saud co-production brought to you by the 'fake news' soap opera of main stream media, starring you and your loved ones in their very own personal demise???