| 27 Jan 2023 |
 shruub | I see, thanks! | 17:56:38 |
| shruub | In reply to @shruub:tchncs.de
yeah, so seemingly, logging on successfully shows WARN conduit::api::ruma_wrapper::axum: Deserialization(Json(Error("missing field identifier", line: 1, column: 149))) and 400 Bad Request: M_BAD_JSON: Failed to deserialize request. . Trying to login with the delegated user id fails with 403 Forbidden: M_FORBIDDEN: Wrong username or password. so basically 403 Forbidden: M_FORBIDDEN: Wrong username or password. is what is the main problem, as the server won't recognize the delegated user id. | 17:57:39 |
 Timo on Conduit ⚡️ | What server are you connecting to and what is the delegated user id? | 17:58:34 |
| Timo on Conduit ⚡️ | And what client do you use? | 17:58:44 |
| shruub | Client; schildi chat, server is matrix.habedieeh.re and the user id is habedieeh.re. Basically just s fresh docker install of conduit | 17:59:30 |
| shruub | * Client; schildi chat, server is matrix.habedieeh.re and the user id is @my-user-name:habedieeh.re. Basically just s fresh docker install of conduit | 18:00:28 |
| Timo on Conduit ⚡️ | Can you try using element to see if it works? | 18:00:38 |
| shruub | sure | 18:01:16 |
| Timo on Conduit ⚡️ | https://federationtester.matrix.org/#habedieeh.re | 18:04:57 |
| Timo on Conduit ⚡️ | Your server name is wrong, you should set server_name in your conduit config to habedieeh.re, delete the database and try again | 18:05:38 |
| shruub | but wouldn't that require me to have a reverse proxy on habedieeh.re on port 8448? | 18:07:41 |
| shruub | * but wouldn't that require me to have a reverse proxy on habedieeh.re proxying port 8448? | 18:07:57 |
| shruub | btw, element works the same way in that schildichat does without specifing a user id and rather the server and then the user. | 18:08:37 |
 walteb | No, delegation redirects clients and other servers to the correct domain | 18:09:04 |
| walteb | The server name in the config file is like the public name of your server. It's what shows up in your usernames and what users enter when they log in. | 18:09:56 |
| shruub | oh I see, alright. Sorry for causing all that trouble and efford then! :) | 18:10:41 |
| walteb | Haha I should have mentioned it. One of those things that is obvious in retrospect only | 18:12:00 |
| shruub | yup :D | 18:12:41 |
 Gitlab | [famedly/conduit] moritzheiber
commented on
merge request !434: Add a dynamic address resolution to the Docker healthcheck
@jfowl No worries, thank you for following up :slight_smile: It was a matter of tuning the delimiter configuration a little and using a different output variable. I've pushed the relevant changes and the healthcheck.sh should work again now.
| 18:18:35 |
| Gitlab | [famedly/conduit] yusdacra
opened
merge request !456: Fix Nix flake build
Fixes the nix flake builds by using dream2nix, which doesn't have the vendoring problem that naersk does.
cc @ChaotiCryptidz
- [x] I agree to release my code and all other changes of this MR under the Apache-2.0 license
| 21:15:36 |
 Esmail EL BoB ⚡️ | hi, does conduit supports https://matrix.org/blog/2023/01/27/this-week-in-matrix-2023-01-27 ? | 22:05:40 |
| Esmail EL BoB ⚡️ | or will add it | 22:05:44 |
| Esmail EL BoB ⚡️ | * hi, does conduit supports https://matrix.org/blog/2023/01/27/this-week-in-matrix-2023-01-27 ? (the faster joins) | 22:06:06 |
| walteb | Esmail EL BoB ⚡️: when I tried conduit it had near-instant joins. Although be aware that it does not currently backfill history. | 22:09:47 |
 Julien | Same for me. Some channels took several minutes, sometimes even hours to join on Synapse. It's instant on conduit | 22:16:36 |
| Gitlab | [famedly/conduit] jfowl
approved
merge request !434: Add a dynamic address resolution to the Docker healthcheck | 22:42:54 |
| Gitlab | [famedly/conduit] jfowl
pushed
2 commits
to
next:
-
cfcc9086
Add a dynamic address resolution to the Docker healthcheck
by Moritz Heiber
-
06df04f6
Merge branch 'fix_docker_healthcheck_for_address' into 'next' […]
| 22:43:06 |
| Gitlab | [famedly/conduit] jfowl
merged
merge request !434: Add a dynamic address resolution to the Docker healthcheck | 22:43:06 |
 aaron | In reply to @esmail:esmailelbob.xyz
hi, does conduit supports https://matrix.org/blog/2023/01/27/this-week-in-matrix-2023-01-27 ? (the faster joins) I don’t believe it supports them yet. I think the formal name for that is sync v3 or something? Just lazy loading for server-server sync. | 23:00:05 |
| aaron | Although as mentioned it’s quite a bit faster than synapse at joining already. But that should make it near instant. | 23:00:36 |
