| 25 Jun 2021 |
|  @smolkeys:matrix.org changed their display name from Observer to Impostor. | 11:02:07 |
| @smolkeys:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 11:02:58 |
| @smolkeys:matrix.org left the room. | 11:03:37 |
| 26 Jun 2021 |
|  @parkurist:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:43:46 |
| @parkurist:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:43:48 |
| @parkurist:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:47:33 |
| @parkurist:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:47:34 |
| @parkurist:matrix.org left the room. | 20:47:35 |
|  @parkuristt:matrix.org joined the room. | 21:56:48 |
| @parkuristt:matrix.org | hey | 21:57:33 |
| @parkuristt:matrix.org | bye | 21:57:35 |
| @parkuristt:matrix.org left the room. | 21:57:42 |
| 27 Jun 2021 |
|  @echedeylr:mozilla.org joined the room. | 00:05:58 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | Good night. I wanted to ask if using JDK in LTS versions is a goal for the future | 00:06:32 |
 @deltanedas:matrix.org | java 11 isnt supported | 00:07:08 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | Given that version 17 is the next LTS | 00:07:17 |
| @deltanedas:matrix.org | jdk 15 features are used | 00:07:18 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | sorry, i didnt express myself correctly here | 00:07:30 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | i read that is using JDK 16 | 00:07:36 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | and next JDK will be 17 | 00:07:44 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | which is an LTS version | 00:07:50 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | I wanted to know if the next JDK will be maintained stuck until next LTS is released as JDK 17 is LTS | 00:08:25 |
| @deltanedas:matrix.org | anuke will probably support it once enough people compile using it and presumably fail | 00:09:32 |
| @deltanedas:matrix.org | or it adds a nice compile time feature | 00:09:50 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | I am only interesting in knowing about support for LTS versions being the current one (discarded already) or future ones and getting stuck there to make easier the platform configuration for development | 00:10:49 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | * I am only interested in knowing about support for LTS versions being the current one (discarded already) or future ones and getting stuck there to make easier the platform configuration for development | 00:10:57 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | Most GNU/Linux distributions, specially Debian derivated, only maintain LTS versions in their repositories over the time. In a release, you can get JDK non-LTS versions, but these get ignored with the time and LTS versions not only get the default but are the ones with support. | 00:12:39 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | as I am a newbie in Mindustry, i dont know which were the reasons to choose a JDK non-LTS version: if the game has a goal to change with Java changes over the time to experiment new ways to do things, if was because the chosen one in a beginning was non-LTS and some features were saw as good (possibility to get stuck LTS in the future), etc | 00:16:34 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | * as I am a newbie in Mindustry, i dont know which were the reasons to choose a JDK non-LTS version: if the game has a goal to change with Java changes over the time to experiment new ways to do things, if was because the chosen one in a beginning was non-LTS and some features were saw as good (possibility to get stuck in a LTS in the future), etc | 00:16:55 |
| @echedeylr:mozilla.org | * I am only interested in knowing about support for LTS versions being the current one (discarded already) or future ones and getting stuck there in order to make easier the platform configuration for development | 00:18:55 |
