| 28 Mar 2024 |
 ggainey | we thought you might still be having Internet Issues | 15:34:46 |
 ipanova | yeah i figured, i joined half past | 15:57:11 |
| 4 Apr 2024 |
|  dkliban joined the room. | 13:18:27 |
 dralley | I canceled today's meeting, there's conflicts | 13:34:37 |
| dralley | can reschedule it if someone has something to bring up | 13:34:48 |
| ggainey | I'm good, thanks Daniel | 13:55:30 |
| 10 Apr 2024 |
|  bmbouter joined the room. | 13:17:55 |
| 11 Apr 2024 |
| dralley | ipanova: do you think we could get COPR folks to come to the RPM meeting today | 13:50:44 |
| dralley | or set up a new timeslot with them? | 13:51:07 |
| dralley | ggainey: Pedro Pessoa | 13:51:20 |
| ipanova | that probably be too short notice so i would reccomend setting up new time with them | 13:53:17 |
| dralley | ok. since there's an overlap with some career development sessions that aren't going to be recorded, I think I will try to move the meeting to tomorrow during an earlier timeslot, and I'll invite them | 14:52:29 |
 Pedro Pessoa | Can we accept this? https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/issues/3495 | 18:39:07 |
| ggainey | just did some digging - yes. Looks like we're setting it on sync here https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/blob/main/pulp_rpm/app/modulemd.py#L150 , but the upload-path never does | 18:59:14 |
| ggainey | will def need a migration to fix any snippets currently missing one | 18:59:40 |
| ggainey | sigh, fun | 18:59:43 |
| 12 Apr 2024 |
| dralley | yup | 15:04:57 |
| 16 Apr 2024 |
|  Magnus Gustavsson joined the room. | 10:03:06 |
|  Magnus Gustavsson joined the room. | 12:22:05 |
| 17 Apr 2024 |
| dralley | Pedro Pessoa: I was thinking that we should probably backport https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/3503 to at least the latest stable release, but I think the fact that the PR is 3 commits (even though it got squashed on merge) might break our backport automation (which only supports one commit PR last I checked) | 15:36:08 |
| dralley | we could just git cherrypick -x that commit manually though | 15:36:29 |
| dralley | actually we would have to do it manually anyway, because we can't backport the migration | 15:37:08 |
| dralley | only fix the uploads | 15:37:22 |
| dralley | * only fix future uploads | 15:37:41 |
| Pedro Pessoa | So I need to add one commit with test+fix only for the backport PRs right? Are these the backport target branches? | 16:26:38 |
| dralley | you can backport to only the latest one, I think that would be fine | 17:46:09 |
| dralley | 3.23 too if you want | 17:46:27 |
| dralley | I wouldn't bother with the rest | 17:46:38 |
| 18 Apr 2024 |
| dralley | ggainey: mtg? | 15:03:58 |
| Pedro Pessoa | Hey x9c4 , just want to let you know that after RPM last meeting with COPR and our today's meeting, we have concluded that we dont need to use the proposed PGP models yet. One of the main benefits of using those would be to better track package signatures for handling post-upload signing/re-signing, but tracking that would introduce too much complexity without enough benefits, as the post-upload signing is not the main workflow for COPR (they don't need to do that so often as they do uploads). | 17:13:17 |
