| 10 Apr 2024 |
|  @thompson_plug:matrix.org joined the room. | 22:32:35 |
 kainino (he/they) | https://crbug.com/333758771 | 23:32:52 |
| kainino (he/they) | Seems like an accident that this experiment affected requestAnimationFrame | 23:33:04 |
| kainino (he/they) | (which is what I suspected - didn't think we would try any experiments intentionally affecting rAF) | 23:33:52 |
| kainino (he/they) | the experiment collided with a bug that's been fixed already in Canary | 23:34:41 |
| 11 Apr 2024 |
 Andre Weissflog | thanks for filing the issue kainino (he/they) | 07:07:59 |
|  Deepak Sharma joined the room. | 09:41:37 |
|  mehmetoguzderin changed their profile picture. | 11:09:56 |
|  PpluX joined the room. | 12:51:25 |
|  Mehdi Saffar joined the room. | 21:40:52 |
| 15 Apr 2024 |
 François Beaufort | In case you missed it, WebGPU is getting more powerful 🔥 in Chrome 124:
✅ Read-only and read-write storage textures
✅ Service workers and shared workers support
✅ New adapter information attributes
✅ Bug fixes
Check out https://developer.chrome.com/blog/new-in-webgpu-124 to learn more. | 07:55:01 |
|  Sireesha Pasumarthy joined the room. | 14:43:52 |
 rconde01 | Kangz: Couple questions about the meeting transition. 1) will the minutes still be public? 2) Is there a way other than the "expert flow" to submit feedback? | 15:43:30 |
| rconde01 | * Kangz: Couple questions about the meeting transition. 1) will the minutes still be public? 2) Is there any way other than the "expert flow" to submit feedback? | 15:43:45 |
| rconde01 | and to clarify, the IP commitment is basically people can say things they want to be non-public? | 15:44:44 |
 Kangz |
- yes 2) github issues, or even in the meeting as long as you don't contribute exact design.
| 15:46:51 |
| Kangz | It's not about being non-public, is to better track contributions so that we can have stronger IP commitment when the Candidate Recommendation comes. | 15:47:21 |
| rconde01 | oh ok - so anybody can still join the meetings | 15:47:58 |
| Kangz | Something about CG contributions being about only the thing you contributed, and WG contributions about the whole spec's interaction with it? (but not a lawyer so ¯_(ツ)_/¯) | 15:48:14 |
| rconde01 | thx | 15:48:23 |
| Kangz | * Something about CG contributions being about only the thing you contributed, and WG contributions about the whole spec's interaction with it? (but not a lawyer so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) | 15:48:28 |
| Kangz | I think I'll wait a bit for questions to come and answer them all in a reply. (with review from Francois Daoust to make sure that's actually the W3C rules) | 15:50:07 |
| kainino (he/they) | IIUC the IP commitment is committing to adhere to the W3C patent policy for any IP you contribute to the spec:
W3C operates under a royalty-free patent policy by which participants in standards development make commitments to license their standards-essential patents royalty-free to implementers and users of the W3C specifications.
| 17:08:38 |
| kainino (he/they) | the ultimate goal is to grant royalty-free licenses to any patents necessary to implement the thing | 17:09:10 |
| kainino (he/they) | * the ultimate goal of the commitment is that royalty-free licenses will be granted on any patents necessary to implement the thing | 17:09:54 |
| kainino (he/they) | * the ultimate goal of the commitment is that royalty-free licenses will be granted on any patents necessary to implement WebGPU | 17:10:00 |
| 16 Apr 2024 |
|  uvi joined the room. | 11:05:03 |
 mrshannon | Redacted or Malformed Event | 11:53:06 |
| @thompson_plug:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 23:34:38 |
| 17 Apr 2024 |
| Kangz banned @thompson_plug:matrix.org (Weed spam). | 07:37:45 |
