My rashrc contains:

#! /usr/bin/env racket
;; emacs - set major mode: SPC h M racket-mode

(displayln "=== Loading rashrc")

;; rashrc is NOT a module, and gets none of them. rashrc is mainly there to let
;; you muck up the namespace that you use interactively. Prefer rashrc.rkt
;; @secref["Interactive_Use" #:doc '(lib "rash/scribblings/rash.scrbl")]
(current-repl-display-startup-hints? #f)

(define-line-macro f
(lambda (stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_) #'{echo "foo"}])))

and rashrc.rkt:

#lang racket

(displayln "=== Loading rashrc.rkt")

(require
 linea/line-macro
 (for-syntax syntax/parse))

(define-line-macro b
  (lambda (stx)
    (syntax-parse stx
      [(_) #'{echo "bar"}])))

The line-macro f works but the b does not. Does anybody know why? (My racket-fu is too young. Sorry guys)

My rashrc contains:

#! /usr/bin/env racket
;; emacs - set major mode: SPC h M racket-mode

(displayln "=== Loading rashrc")

;; rashrc is NOT a module, and gets none of them. rashrc is mainly there to let
;; you muck up the namespace that you use interactively. Prefer rashrc.rkt
;; @secref["Interactive_Use" #:doc '(lib "rash/scribblings/rash.scrbl")]
(current-repl-display-startup-hints? #f)

(define-line-macro f
(lambda (stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_) #'{echo "foo"}])))

and rashrc.rkt:

#lang racket

(displayln "=== Loading rashrc.rkt")

(require
 linea/line-macro
 (for-syntax syntax/parse))

(define-line-macro b
  (lambda (stx)
    (syntax-parse stx
      [(_) #'{echo "bar"}])))

The line-macro f works but the b from rashrc.rkt does not. Does anybody know why? (My racket-fu is too young. Sorry guys)

My rashrc contains:

#! /usr/bin/env racket
;; emacs - set major mode: SPC h M racket-mode

(displayln "=== Loading rashrc")

;; rashrc is NOT a module, and gets none of them. rashrc is mainly there to let
;; you muck up the namespace that you use interactively. Prefer rashrc.rkt
;; @secref["Interactive_Use" #:doc '(lib "rash/scribblings/rash.scrbl")]
(current-repl-display-startup-hints? #f)

(define-line-macro f
  (lambda (stx)
    (syntax-parse stx
      [(_) #'{echo "foo"}])))

and rashrc.rkt:

#lang racket

(displayln "=== Loading rashrc.rkt")

(require
 linea/line-macro
 (for-syntax syntax/parse))

(define-line-macro b
  (lambda (stx)
    (syntax-parse stx
      [(_) #'{echo "bar"}])))

The line-macro f works but the b from rashrc.rkt does not. Does anybody know why? (My racket-fu is too young. Sorry guys)

and adding (provide (all-defined-out)) results in

> b
Result 1:
echo: undefined;
 cannot reference an identifier before its definition
  in module: top-level

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:30:28AM -0800, noweb-user wrote:

I believe the problem I have is that rash-repl.exe is a 64-bit application and I can't find a 64-bit version of readline. I believe we cannot mix two architectures in the same program.

Aha!

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- %file rash-repl.exe libhistory8.dll libreadline8.dll rash-repl.exe: PE32+ executable (console) x86-64 (stripped to external PDB), for MS Windows libhistory8.dll: PE32 executable (DLL) (console) Intel 80386 (stripped to external PDB), for MS Windows libreadline8.dll: PE32 executable (DLL) (console) Intel 80386 (stripped to external PDB), for MS Windows --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Since I cannot find a 64-bit application, would it be much trouble for you to compile rash-repl.exe as a 32-bit application? I believe this would take care of things for me and, therefore, for practically all other Windows users --- having this exact issue.

Did you install the 64-bit version of Racket? When you raco pkg install rash I assume it compiles it according to the version of Racket you installed. Perhaps Racket is bundling the wrong version of libedit? At any rate, I know some issues with libedit bundling were fixed in Racket 8.0, so it might already be fixed for newer Rackets.

I don't actually distribute a pre-built executable, just a Racket package definition which raco pkg knows how to build.

But I know you're busy. If this is not just another command for compiling this desired version, don't worry about it. I can manage to eventually compile the right library version for the right architecture.

Yeah, I'm not sure how to force Racket to build for a specific architecture, and I don't have time to dive into that right now. Sorry.

Thank you either way. I'm insisting because I think the software is great. I read your paper carefully in the last couple of days. Thanks for writing it.

Thanks! I hope to make time to make it better eventually!

In reply to @bostx123:matrix.org

and adding (provide (all-defined-out)) results in

> b
Result 1:
echo: undefined;
 cannot reference an identifier before its definition
  in module: top-level

it looks like #lang rash and (require (for-syntax racket/base)) must be used in order to be satisfy the compiler, so here the code:

#lang rash

(displayln "=== Loading rashrc.rkt")

(require
 linea/line-macro
 (for-syntax racket/base syntax/parse))

(define-line-macro b
  (lambda (stx)
    (syntax-parse stx
      [(_) #'{ echo "bar" }])))

But it doesn't help because I still get

> b
Result 1:
resolve-command-path: can't find executable for b

it looks like #lang rash and (require (for-syntax racket/base)) must be used in order to be satisfy the compiler, so here is the code:

#lang rash

(displayln "=== Loading rashrc.rkt")

(require
 linea/line-macro
 (for-syntax racket/base syntax/parse))

(define-line-macro b
  (lambda (stx)
    (syntax-parse stx
      [(_) #'{ echo "bar" }])))

But it doesn't help because I still get

> b
Result 1:
resolve-command-path: can't find executable for b

#lang rash

(displayln "=== Loading rashrc.rkt")

(require
 linea/line-macro
 (for-syntax racket/base syntax/parse))

(provide (all-defined-out))

(define-line-macro b
  (lambda (stx)
    (syntax-parse stx
      [(_) #'{ echo "bar" }])))

• 892cea78 DRY eval-rash-file by Rostislav Svoboda
• c832c8ad Merge pull request #81 from Bost/master […]