!LQrdVpOJEohPSWMlmf:matrix.org

Smilei users

256 Members
github.com/SmileiPIC/Smilei5 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
17 Apr 2024
@virana:matrix.orgvirIs there any way I can get the electric field of only the electrons? Because, from what I understand, the Ex, Ey and so on contains the electric field of the laser and the particles too, right?11:10:44
@z10f:matrix.orgz10fno, it's not possible11:11:54
@z10f:matrix.orgz10fthe laser, and plasma electromagnetic fields are on the same grid11:12:17
@z10f:matrix.orgz10fif you do laser envelope simulations you separate the laser field11:12:33
@z10f:matrix.orgz10fif you do AM simulations in principle you can filter out the mode 011:12:53
@z10f:matrix.orgz10fbut there is no separation of fields by an electron beam for example11:13:07
@z10f:matrix.orgz10fI don't know your physical set-up, so for the moment I don't have any other clues11:13:31
@virana:matrix.orgvirAnd I also saw that in the track particle diagnostic, Ex and Ey were one of the attributes. So what does it do?11:13:32
@z10f:matrix.orgz10fthese are the fields interpolated at the particle position11:13:47
@z10f:matrix.orgz10fso the Ex and Ey acting on each tracked electron11:13:58
@z10f:matrix.orgz10finterpolated from the grid11:14:05
@virana:matrix.orgvir
In reply to @z10f:matrix.org
I don't know your physical set-up, so for the moment I don't have any other clues
I have a Gaussian laser beam which interacts with a thin foil and I want to see the transmitted intensity but I believe that the transmitted intensity also contains the field from the particles (in my case the electrons after the interaction of laser pulse with target)
11:15:29
@virana:matrix.orgvir
In reply to @z10f:matrix.org
so the Ex and Ey acting on each tracked electron
Oh ok. Thanks.
11:15:55
@virana:matrix.orgvir changed their display name from virana to vir.11:16:14
@z10f:matrix.orgz10f
In reply to @virana:matrix.org
I have a Gaussian laser beam which interacts with a thin foil and I want to see the transmitted intensity but I believe that the transmitted intensity also contains the field from the particles (in my case the electrons after the interaction of laser pulse with target)
ok, you can define a Probe plane after the foil and integrate the intensity that is transmitted
11:17:16
@z10f:matrix.orgz10f
In reply to @virana:matrix.org
I have a Gaussian laser beam which interacts with a thin foil and I want to see the transmitted intensity but I believe that the transmitted intensity also contains the field from the particles (in my case the electrons after the interaction of laser pulse with target)
* ok, for example you can define a Probe plane after the foil and integrate the intensity that is transmitted
11:17:25
@z10f:matrix.orgz10fbut you would not be able to separate the field that is coming with the particles crossing the plane11:17:47
@virana:matrix.orgvirOk thanks.11:18:55
@fredpz:matrix.orgfredpzOr you directly have the poynting fluxes given by the scalar diagnostic11:27:56
18 Apr 2024
@almondon:matrix.orgAlmndn
In reply to @z10f:matrix.org
are you respecting the constraint on the mesh given by the Debye length (which depends on temperature)? See https://smileipic.github.io/tutorials/basics_thermal_plasma.html
Thanks @z10f for the hint, yes Debye length is quite important, I will try to check that.
07:46:34
@abigailjames:matrix.orgabigailjamesHi there. A quick question about chirp. I've tried both the chirp profile as described in the documentation and adding the chirp to the spatial profile. In both cases it appears that the frequency of the pulse continues to change to over the full duration of the simulation rather than the duration of the pulse. Have i misunderstood something? 17:45:53
@fredpz:matrix.orgfredpzThe frequency will keep changing. There is no precise definition of a "pulse"17:55:14
@z10f:matrix.orgz10fhow did you add the chirp to your profile? or in general what is the space-time profile19:03:53
@z10f:matrix.orgz10fand how do you see a frequency where the laser pulse is not present? 19:21:08
19 Apr 2024
@sanjeev273:matrix.orgSanjeev Kumar
In reply to @fredpz:matrix.org
Check the "select" option. You can combine px>10 with t>something i guess
select="any(t>10, px>10)" not working in post-processing for TrackParticle diagnostic.
14:08:03
@fredpz:matrix.orgfredpzWhat do you mean14:11:02
@sanjeev273:matrix.orgSanjeev KumarElectron_bunch_evolution.png
Download Electron_bunch_evolution.png
14:13:34
@sanjeev273:matrix.orgSanjeev Kumarmeans no change in result with and without select="any(t>10, px>10)". but there should be change. 14:13:35
@fredpz:matrix.orgfredpzWhy15:15:43
@fredpz:matrix.orgfredpzAre you sure this makes any difference?15:16:07

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 5