!FuCrwzKQBbbIltofEw:matrix.org

FOSDEM video

71 Members
FOSDEM video | matrix #video:fosdem.org | mention room number + issue15 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
7 Feb 2024
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelstand it's the usual "Service unavailable", which indeed means it hasn't synced yet (as explained by the FAQ)10:45:01
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelstnot sure why your "RELEASED:" email was sent already then though.10:45:26
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelstit shouldn't have been10:45:48
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelst (not the end of the world, it will eventually be synced, but this is a bit confusing...) 10:46:06
@dan:nimblea.peDan Jenkins
In reply to @wouter:fosdem.org
We do have the ability to add an "apology slide" to the video. It looks like the second slide at https://github.com/FOSDEM/video/issues/233 and it will be inserted after the opening slide but before the main video. Suggestions for the wording are welcome.
Oh interesting. Maybe just put something like ~2 minutes of no audio/video of presenter - just so people know it’ll come back?
10:47:44
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelst
In reply to @dan:nimblea.pe
Oh interesting. Maybe just put something like ~2 minutes of no audio/video of presenter - just so people know it’ll come back?
sure. Refresh my memory though, which talk was that?
10:48:27
@boegel:fosdem.orgboegel (Kenneth Hoste)
In reply to @wouter:fosdem.org
not sure why your "RELEASED:" email was sent already then though.
Maybe related to it being released fir a 2nd time, after you did a reset on my request because the video that turned up initially had audio sync issues?
10:48:41
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelstaaaahh, yeah, that would definitely be it10:48:52
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelst(it's possible to delete a video before we do a reset, but I decided not to bother because it's too involved and not really worth it)10:49:36
@boegel:fosdem.orgboegel (Kenneth Hoste)ok, clear, I need to be a bit more patient... hopefully the video is OK now, no more audio sync issues (looked fine in review system)10:51:43
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter VerhelstI'm pretty sure it will be fine, yes10:51:53
@dan:nimblea.peDan Jenkins
In reply to @wouter:fosdem.org
sure. Refresh my memory though, which talk was that?
https://fosdem.org/2024/schedule/event/fosdem-2024-3646-using-gstreamer-to-build-real-time-applications-with-golang/
10:52:03
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelst Dan Jenkins: done. You won't see it in the review interface, but when you release the video the slide will be added during transcode. 10:54:14
@libv:matrix.org@libv:matrix.org changed their display name from [K]libv to libv.13:09:00
@mbucher:mozilla.orgmanuel joined the room.15:21:47
@mbucher:mozilla.orgmanuelHi, I messed up my review by setting the wrong end time. The video ended up too long. Is it still possible to fix?15:22:41
@mbucher:mozilla.orgmanuelThe video in question: https://video.fosdem.org/2024/h1302/fosdem-2024-1873-debugging-http-3-upload-speed-in-firefox.av1.webm15:23:56
@matthew:matrix.orgMatthew Wouter Verhelst: do you know if my vid needs to be unwedged somehow? it's been processing since 8am or so (and meanwhile the press has picked up on it, albeit using a copy we put on youtube, and i'm feeling a bit guilty that the fosdem copy isn't live: https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/07/whatsapp-is-preparing-to-roll-out-third-party-chat-support/) 15:30:45
@jklowden:attendees.fosdem.orgjklowden
In reply to @wouter:fosdem.org
jklowden: what Matthew said -- the whole point of that review interface is so you can edit it and we don't have to do it for you. We used to do that (e.g., in 2014), and then it took us until September to review everything...

Hmph. I'm supposed to read the documentation?

Seriously, thanks for correcting me. I edited the video. The only question is have is about something it said upon submission:

The audio channel should be changed to channel 0

I didn't mean to change the audio channel. IMO the audio quality is great.

16:38:45
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelst
In reply to @matthew:matrix.org
Wouter Verhelst: do you know if my vid needs to be unwedged somehow? it's been processing since 8am or so (and meanwhile the press has picked up on it, albeit using a copy we put on youtube, and i'm feeling a bit guilty that the fosdem copy isn't live: https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/07/whatsapp-is-preparing-to-roll-out-third-party-chat-support/)

It's not stuck, it just takes a long time. We've had talks taking 8 hours.

I have configured the system so that we have high throughput, rather than quick turnaround per individual talk. It does mean you need to wait a bit though.

16:39:07
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter VerhelstI'm not at home right now, but I'll have a look when I do get home to see if there's anything I can do to speed things up a bit.16:39:48
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelst
In reply to @jklowden:attendees.fosdem.org

Hmph. I'm supposed to read the documentation?

Seriously, thanks for correcting me. I edited the video. The only question is have is about something it said upon submission:

The audio channel should be changed to channel 0

I didn't mean to change the audio channel. IMO the audio quality is great.

You're not 🙂

That message is indeed confusing. It's because at the point where it is generated, we don't know whether the requested channel and the old channel differ. This is something that's on my to-do list to fix.

Channel 0 is the default channel though, so it's the correct thing if you liked the default.

16:47:43
@jklowden:attendees.fosdem.orgjklowdenExcellent, thanks. I approved the video. 17:00:03
@matthew:matrix.orgMatthew
In reply to @wouter:fosdem.org

It's not stuck, it just takes a long time. We've had talks taking 8 hours.

I have configured the system so that we have high throughput, rather than quick turnaround per individual talk. It does mean you need to wait a bit though.

cool, fair eonugh :)
17:03:36
@matthew:matrix.orgMatthew
In reply to @wouter:fosdem.org

It's not stuck, it just takes a long time. We've had talks taking 8 hours.

I have configured the system so that we have high throughput, rather than quick turnaround per individual talk. It does mean you need to wait a bit though.

* cool, fair enough :)
17:03:41
@travis:t2l.ioTravisRhey folks, my talk had desynced audio in the preview and had it corrected, but now the released artifact is desynced badly. Is there a way to unpublish/send it back for review?20:13:31
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelstwhich talk is that?21:05:57
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelstnvm, there is only one talk by anyone named "Travis", and it's about matrix. I'm guessing it's that one :-)21:08:16
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelstdone21:10:17
@wouter:fosdem.orgWouter Verhelstyou'll get a new review invitation soon21:10:41

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 5