24 Jan 2017 |
oneyb | Howdy Everyone! I ate your food 2 weeks ago. I am gonna try to help with the react gui (with @mcmunder) and will be learning and using brightway (with Isabel). Just saying hello for now. Have a nice day! | 10:33:06 |
mcmunder | Hi! | 10:33:40 |
mklarmann | : ) Hi Brian! | 10:40:19 |
mklarmann | @oneyb:matrix.org if there is any question you might mave, just write here. Good look with the olive oil! | 10:42:49 |
mklarmann | luck | 10:42:59 |
26 Jan 2017 |
mklarmann | https://gist.github.com/matthewhudson/1475276 | 17:25:10 |
27 Jan 2017 |
mklarmann | https://www.realartists.com/blog/ship-20.html | 14:38:25 |
oneyb | hot stuff. I guess emacs has a package/function/mode for that ;). See https://xkcd.com/378/ | 15:37:28 |
mcmunder | ;-) | 15:46:46 |
mcmunder | Atom! | 15:46:51 |
mcmunder | Real programmers use Atom! | 15:47:02 |
mklarmann | With the exeption of Richard Stallman - who uses emacs. When I met 2 of the github founders, they told me, that there is a universe of things that just works for richard stallman, on not many people else.... | 16:03:43 |
mklarmann | there is definitly different perspectives going on, even so, their goals are so close together... | 16:04:25 |
mklarmann | btw emacs should not be regarded as an editor, but more of an operating system... | 16:06:13 |
mcmunder | oh yeah, the stallman guy! writes email from the command line!! | 16:07:01 |
mcmunder | or from his emacs operating system ;-) | 16:07:21 |
oneyb | Command line emails have their place. Easy automated alerts etc.. The GNU ecosystem is pretty handy. It is also a good example of the longevity of community software. I wonder how long ship will be around. Emacs is older than I and still going strong... | 17:07:32 |
mklarmann | Ship will be most likely surpassed in 2 years by something better. | 17:22:24 |
mklarmann | Emacs has been surpassed long time ago ; ) | 17:23:05 |
oneyb | Yes it has! Spacemacs! Vi+Emacs = awesomeness! | 17:29:20 |
mklarmann | This has gotten out of hand | 18:03:15 |
mklarmann | 😜😜 | 18:03:26 |
2 Feb 2017 |
oneyb | Good morning. I am looking at the data for the burning of Olive tree branches and probably should calculate the impact on the carbon footprint of olive oil. To help me be structured with the olive oil analysis, I have a few questions. What is the goal and scope of this LCA? The data has been given to me. I guess my final goal is the carbon footprint from the burning of wood pruned from Olive oil? Please help! Thanks in advance! | 07:08:46 |
mklarmann | Well the goal is, that you can familiarize with brightway. You want to do an lcia ( life cycle impact assessment) on the last process first. (Which might be olive oil to market). You could do a comparison of GWP 100 and 50 (IPCC Standard). All other exchanges that come before will be included in this calculation. So, yes. If there is actually a process existent for bruning, you can single it out. | 07:49:58 |
mklarmann | If you ask me, what might be interesting about olive oil. I would try a comparison to rapeseed oil and find out why olive oil is so much worse on GWP... | 07:53:18 |
mklarmann | If you want to help Isabel working with brightway, you can figure out how to replace one exchange with another... | 07:55:52 |
mklarmann | Does this help? | 07:56:09 |
oneyb | Yup. Otherwise without a goal I am messing around to mess around :). With spacemacs of course ;) | 09:22:34 |
mklarmann | Download Bildschirmfoto 2017-02-02 um 10.23.26.png | 09:24:01 |
oneyb | hahaha | 09:24:28 |