13 Dec 2022 |
mondstern | In reply to @imbev:matrix.org i'm open to contributions I could, apart from painting app logo, translate if that were possible. | 19:34:23 |
imbev | the app is still in a very early stage, however that is welcome | 19:36:10 |
14 Dec 2022 |
imbev | with most clients, threads aren't supported with thread messages appearing identical to replies at the same level of other messages | 15:04:54 |
imbev | in clients such as Element with threads enabled, replies remain at the same level as messages, but thread messages are hidden behind a sort of thread view | 15:05:29 |
imbev | * in clients such as Element with threads enabled, replies remain at the same level as messages, but thread messages are hidden behind a "thread view" | 15:05:42 |
imbev | while i intend to display thread messages as comments viewed only on a post-basis, i'm unsure about replies | 15:06:36 |
imbev | should replies be treated the same as a thread message? | 15:06:50 |
imbev | should replies be displayed in the feed at the same level as the original message? | 15:07:23 |
imbev | should their be a toggle? | 15:07:31 |
imbev | thoughts? | 15:07:35 |
mirdaki | If replies are treated as thread messages, how do you differentiate comments on those replies? I think that gets hard to understand very quickly (if you're using a regularly chat client anyway)
So I would suggest making a reply a separate message. Granted, I haven't looked at how messages can reference other messages outside a threaded context yet, so there may be other problems there | 15:24:58 |
imbev | i'm inclined towards the same solution, however it does make a slightly less consistent experience with chat clients that don't support threads | 15:27:24 |
imbev |  Download Screenshot from 2022-12-14 09-26-21.png | 15:27:33 |
imbev | object 3 is a thread message and object 1 is a reply message, both in response to the same message | 15:28:55 |
imbev | it wouldn't be a problem to differentiate the two, however i would need to look into replies within a thread | 15:29:40 |
imbev | * object 3 is a thread message and object 1 is a reply message, both in response to the same message (after conversion to matrix-social-specific data format, not the original matrix json) | 15:31:32 |
imbev | i understand your problem with a chain of replies | 15:32:41 |
imbev | i'll ask in the beyond chat room | 15:33:25 |
16 Dec 2022 |
| erlend_sh joined the room. | 20:24:28 |
| valka joined the room. | 20:44:53 |
imbev |
maybe responding to messages could be sent in a thread, but reading replies and threads would be the same (in matrix-social)
| 21:12:54 |
| sea_of_tranquility joined the room. | 21:16:22 |
| Florian Geierstanger joined the room. | 21:45:33 |
17 Dec 2022 |
| David Prieto joined the room. | 00:33:55 |
David Prieto | Hey everyone 👋 | 00:34:29 |
| z1p joined the room. | 05:41:42 |
| erebion 🏳️🌈♾ joined the room. | 07:46:46 |
erebion 🏳️🌈♾ | Hello, just came across the repo. What is matrix-social exactly? | 07:47:16 |
| Andreas Weinzierl joined the room. | 08:26:44 |
mondstern | I mean it's supposed to be a messenger, isn't it ? | 12:34:25 |