| 9 Apr 2020 |
|  6ixeyes joined the room. | 15:22:31 |
| 10 Apr 2020 |
|  Harald joined the room. | 11:35:42 |
|  enilkcals joined the room. | 18:16:38 |
| 11 Apr 2020 |
|  balaa joined the room. | 03:20:15 |
| balaa | In reply to @maiestro:matrix.org
Hi 🙂 hello | 04:21:26 |
|  kcin joined the room. | 13:46:12 |
| kcin changed their display name from nickchow to kcin. | 13:51:32 |
| 13 Apr 2020 |
|  Alex joined the room. | 15:29:48 |
| 20 Apr 2020 |
|  drio joined the room. | 16:17:07 |
| drio set a profile picture. | 16:17:58 |
| 22 Apr 2020 |
| Alex left the room. | 18:31:04 |
| 23 Apr 2020 |
|  Robert joined the room. | 06:55:55 |
| Robert left the room. | 06:56:42 |
|  kernelpanic joined the room. | 13:20:50 |
| 24 Apr 2020 |
|  Andreas joined the room. | 18:34:06 |
| Andreas | Is it possible to create a WireGuard "network" of more than 2 hosts? Of course I could create a star shaped network originating from a central hub, but I'd like all hosts of my VPN to be able to communicate to each other directly. | 18:36:24 |
| 25 Apr 2020 |
|  idanoo joined the room. | 05:41:16 |
| idanoo | Andreas: I believe so, you connect the second 'host' to the first one like a normal client, then add routes for the subnet to go through the tunnel | 05:42:28 |
| drio | Andreas: Absolutely.
If you have a dedicated server and run wireguard on it, each machine that connects to wireguard will have an IP. Then, if you enable routing in the server, it will forward packages as necessary.
If you don't want to setup your own server, look at tailscale (tailscale.com). | 17:00:45 |
| Andreas | drio: idanoo I had hoped that nodes can communicate directly, rather than via the "dedicated server". Because in my case the connection of the dedicated server is slow and sending everything back and forth would be wasteful. | 17:31:05 |
| drio | You want to take a look to tailscale.com | 18:25:13 |
| 26 Apr 2020 |
| Andreas | I have now set up a WireGuard network, and it works. However, I'd like to prevent any services to bind to the interface by default. My services (e.g. sshd) usually listen to 0.0.0.0. I want to use the network only for passing it into Docker containers (which then can communicate directly). | 08:17:58 |
| Andreas | And maybe related: how can I set the interface scope to link (rather than the default global) within wg0.conf? | 08:19:35 |
| 27 Apr 2020 |
|  alfplayer joined the room. | 17:20:37 |
| 28 Apr 2020 |
|  el_jochos joined the room. | 12:17:16 |
| el_jochos | Hey guys hope you can help me: I have a wireguard server and the connections to the clients is running fine. Now I want that the clients can see the other clients in the wireguard-network, so the wireguard-server has a similira function like a gateway. Can you please help me? :) | 12:18:51 |
| 29 Apr 2020 |
|  colemickens changed their display name from Cole Mickens to colemickens. | 00:35:36 |
| idanoo left the room. | 04:42:51 |
| 30 Apr 2020 |
| drio | el_jochos: You just need to enable ip forwarding in your server.
Assuming linux run: sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 | 20:23:46 |
| drio | Now try to ping each of the clients in your wg network. | 20:24:06 |
