i have a box, which should have dynamically created children. i tried to use the following

match model.active_entry.clone() {
  Some(entry) => {
    gtk::Label {
      #[watch]
      // set_text: entry.id.as_str()
      set_text: match entry.data.clone() {
        EntryData::Login { username, ..  } =>      username.unwrap_or_else(String::new).as_str(),
        EntryData::Card { ..  } => "Card",
        EntryData::Identity { ..  } => "Identity",
        EntryData::SecureNote => "Note",
      }
    }
  },
  None => gtk::Label {
    set_text: "No active entry"
  }
}

i have omitted some code for readability

In reply to @chfkch:matrix.org
In the relm book, chapter Continuous Integration, an action actions-rs/toolchain is mentioned, the repository https://github.com/actions-rs is archived.
Is this the one the action points at and if yes, is there a successor?
Since i am using Codeberg as forge, i need to set absolute paths anyway, so i can use non-GH aswell.

In reply to @armadillo9425:matrix.org
When using TypedListView to build a ListView, how do I create a set_sensitive data binding for list items to disable clicking/selecting certain items? The connect_activate lives on ListView level, so while something like root.add_binding(&BoolBinding::new(self.some_boolean), "sensitive"); in the implementation of RelmListItem.bind can give an item the look of being unclickable it doesn't disable the activation event.

That's ok. In general, Relm4 tries to provide more idiomatic abstractions on top of gtk-rs, which means you have to understand gtk-rs first in many cases if you want to solve a problem which is not already abstracted nicely by Relm4 (although TypedListView should actually be part of gtk-rs IMO). I'd look into the issue myself, but unfortunately I don't have time currently.

In reply to @nazar-pc:matrix.org
There are many fokrs, but the gist of it is that you probably do not need it at all.
If you only care about reasonably recent version being installed, it already is on GitHub Actions by default, if you need a specific version then create rust-toolchain.toml and it will be installed automatically by cargo when cargo command is called.
Either way you just run commands in the shell and it "just works".

In reply to @kdwk:matrix.org
Is it possible to call a method on a widget (that does not accept any input) without using update_with_view()? Something in view!{} maybe?

In reply to @aaron:matrix.aaron-erhardt.de
You can actually do method: (), in the view macro IIRC. You can combine that with watch or track as well.

In reply to @aaron:matrix.aaron-erhardt.de
You can actually do method: (), in the view macro IIRC. You can combine that with watch or track as well.

I think there might be some examples using this trick, but I think it should rather be documented in the book here

I guess you can't use factories because you want to add different types of components, right? In this case, you can upcast their root widgets to gtk::Widget and store them somewhere so you can remove them later.