@x1r1 what problem would Civil solve for Aragon Monthly?

people won’t need to learn Markdown to contribute, news get archived on Ethereum, you wouldn’t need to depend on github to be up to access the news, you have a governance aspect to vote on the project direction to further tailor it to our needs. Also has a token model to represent ownership of the newsroom

etc :)

“30 years on, what’s next #ForTheWeb?” by Tim Berners-Lee https://link.medium.com/oVWFf8lH6U

I read that and immediately thought of Aragon… Lots of things align in that article with Aragon’s mission

Hi, what mobile wallets can be used to interact with Aragon via the Rinkeby test network?

I've been wondering whether this channel would be better place to link research, rather than #governance (though I think the research is about governance that I link). It is quiet in here. Would it be better to consider this channel as a place to coordinate appropriate research (& maybe rename)?

Or is there an appetite for, say, the coop to take over producing the monthly (does the monthly have inherent value that we’re currently under-utilising)?

I've been wondering whether this channel would be better place to link research information, rather than #governance (though I think the research linked is about governance that I share). It is quiet in here. Would it be better to consider this channel as a place to coordinate appropriate news & research (& maybe rename)?

The current plan is to wind down monthly after Q2. As Kris points out above, Dgov Foundation does good work putting together a newsletter of dgov topics

And we have our own lightweight monthly newsletter that only takes me a couple hours at most to do: https://twitter.com/AragonProject/status/1123961344812666880?s=19

The newspaper was a nice idea but turned out to be more labor intensive than it’s worth