| 15 Apr 2024 |
 programarivm | ๐พ Can chess be considered as mathematics? | 18:35:30 |
 blind-baldie | Not a lot of numbers in chess | 19:07:34 |
| programarivm | It requires spatial and abstract thinking. | 19:09:00 |
| blind-baldie | Is driving math? | 19:16:16 |
 latot | cheese needs a lot of things, the capacity to predict and read the oponent is too important... you can't solve cheese only as get the "best answer" in a simple way | 19:17:24 |
| latot | you read the oponent, the oponent reads you | 19:17:32 |
| blind-baldie | I'd say it's not Math, but maybe some mathematical concepts could help one Olay better? I'm not a chess player I play Go ๐ | 19:17:35 |
 knoppix | In reply to @programarivm:matrix.org
๐พ Can chess be considered as mathematics? It depends | 19:25:57 |
| knoppix | For example normally the figures are radial symmetric | 19:26:27 |
| knoppix | Except Knight, obviouslt | 19:27:04 |
 @anamnesiac:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 21:01:50 |
| programarivm | The abstract thinking would help to come up with a strategic plan. | 21:02:49 |
| programarivm | It needs to be abstract because elaborating on a strategic plan is not a verbal thing, for example. | 21:04:18 |
| programarivm | In fact, it is to do with abductive reasoning actually. | 21:05:32 |
| programarivm | In my opinion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoning | 21:12:41 |
| @anamnesiac:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 22:13:04 |
| @anamnesiac:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 22:13:07 |
| 16 Apr 2024 |
|  IJNAkashiAR joined the room. | 06:32:02 |
| programarivm | Be that as it may, the sha256 algorithm has been replaced with the adler32 algorithm on the chesslablab server. This means that the invite codes are now more usable. https://github.com/chesslablab/chess-server/issues/271 | 08:19:35 |
| programarivm | 
Download screencapture-chesslablab-org-en-2024-04-16-10_16_45.png | 08:19:53 |
| programarivm | 061f7931 | 08:20:19 |
| knoppix | suppose we have some open Aโ R. How can I define a function, that is integrable (Lebesgue) over any bounded subset of A? The space of locally integrable functions L_{1,loc}(A) is not an option, because it means that the function should be integrable over any compact set that is a subset of A.
For example, if A = (0,โ) the function y=1/x should not be allowed, but it lays in L_{1,loc}(A). | 11:53:15 |
| knoppix | So, the question how can I define the space in some fancy way? | 11:53:34 |
| knoppix | * suppose we have some open Aโ R. How can I define a space of functions, that are integrable (Lebesgue) over any bounded subset of A? The space of locally integrable functions L_{1,loc}(A) is not an option, because it means that the function should be integrable over any compact set that is a subset of A.
For example, if A = (0,โ) the function y=1/x should not be allowed, but it lays in L_{1,loc}(A). | 11:54:18 |
| knoppix | * suppose we have some open Aโ R. How can I define a space of functions, that are integrable (Lebesgue) over any bounded subset of A? The space of locally integrable functions L_{1,loc}(A) is not an option, because it means that the function should be integrable over any compact set that is a subset of A.
For example, if A = (0,โ) the function y=1/x should not be allowed, but it lays in L_{1,loc}(A). | 11:54:27 |
| knoppix | Hmm. How about y*ฯ(A)โL_{1,loc}(R)? | 12:07:49 |
| knoppix | y is then meant as an extension with zero to the whole R | 12:10:46 |
|  jhuc joined the room. | 18:06:49 |
|  เคเคเฅ changed their profile picture. | 19:16:57 |
|  gostmento changed their profile picture. | 20:16:25 |
