15 Apr 2024 |
programarivm | ๐พ Can chess be considered as mathematics? | 18:35:30 |
blind-baldie | Not a lot of numbers in chess | 19:07:34 |
programarivm | It requires spatial and abstract thinking. | 19:09:00 |
blind-baldie | Is driving math? | 19:16:16 |
latot | cheese needs a lot of things, the capacity to predict and read the oponent is too important... you can't solve cheese only as get the "best answer" in a simple way | 19:17:24 |
latot | you read the oponent, the oponent reads you | 19:17:32 |
blind-baldie | I'd say it's not Math, but maybe some mathematical concepts could help one Olay better? I'm not a chess player I play Go ๐ | 19:17:35 |
knoppix | In reply to @programarivm:matrix.org ๐พ Can chess be considered as mathematics? It depends | 19:25:57 |
knoppix | For example normally the figures are radial symmetric | 19:26:27 |
knoppix | Except Knight, obviouslt | 19:27:04 |
anamnesiac | In reply to @programarivm:matrix.org It requires spatial and abstract thinking. How does it require abstract thinking? Every position is a concrete, not abstract, one. The best move is that which is most advantageous in some concrete position. Maybe there are some abstract principles that a chess player applies when he is considering his move but all those abstract principles are less important than the concrete reality of the position on the board. For example the abstract principle says queens are better than pawns, but the concrete reality of a specific position could demand a queen sacrifice for a pawn. | 21:01:50 |
programarivm | The abstract thinking would help to come up with a strategic plan. | 21:02:49 |
programarivm | It needs to be abstract because elaborating on a strategic plan is not a verbal thing, for example. | 21:04:18 |
programarivm | In fact, it is to do with abductive reasoning actually. | 21:05:32 |
programarivm | In my opinion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abductive_reasoning | 21:12:41 |
anamnesiac | Oh you meant non linguistic | 22:13:04 |
anamnesiac | Never mind then | 22:13:07 |
16 Apr 2024 |
| IJNAkashiAR joined the room. | 06:32:02 |
programarivm | Be that as it may, the sha256 algorithm has been replaced with the adler32 algorithm on the chesslablab server. This means that the invite codes are now more usable. https://github.com/chesslablab/chess-server/issues/271 | 08:19:35 |
programarivm | Download screencapture-chesslablab-org-en-2024-04-16-10_16_45.png | 08:19:53 |
programarivm | 061f7931 | 08:20:19 |
knoppix | suppose we have some open Aโ R. How can I define a function, that is integrable (Lebesgue) over any bounded subset of A? The space of locally integrable functions L_{1,loc}(A) is not an option, because it means that the function should be integrable over any compact set that is a subset of A.
For example, if A = (0,โ) the function y=1/x should not be allowed, but it lays in L_{1,loc}(A). | 11:53:15 |
knoppix | So, the question how can I define the space in some fancy way? | 11:53:34 |
knoppix | * suppose we have some open Aโ R. How can I define a space of functions, that are integrable (Lebesgue) over any bounded subset of A? The space of locally integrable functions L_{1,loc}(A) is not an option, because it means that the function should be integrable over any compact set that is a subset of A.
For example, if A = (0,โ) the function y=1/x should not be allowed, but it lays in L_{1,loc}(A). | 11:54:18 |
knoppix | * suppose we have some open Aโ R. How can I define a space of functions, that are integrable (Lebesgue) over any bounded subset of A? The space of locally integrable functions L_{1,loc}(A) is not an option, because it means that the function should be integrable over any compact set that is a subset of A.
For example, if A = (0,โ) the function y=1/x should not be allowed, but it lays in L_{1,loc}(A). | 11:54:27 |
knoppix | Hmm. How about y*ฯ(A)โL_{1,loc}(R)? | 12:07:49 |
knoppix | y is then meant as an extension with zero to the whole R | 12:10:46 |
| jhuc joined the room. | 18:06:49 |
| เคเคเฅ changed their profile picture. | 19:16:57 |
| gostmento changed their profile picture. | 20:16:25 |